Well stated. Unless there's a technical issue blocking the implementation, the workaround is trivial, or it's a case of user error, the general attitude from the devs toward these kinds of things is "why not?"InsanityBringer wrote:ok to be completely honest, even if it is sort of possible already (through means I consider sketchy and possibly not future proof), is there actually any harm in adding a feature like this? I can't imagine it will be very hard to do, and wham, suddenly you have an entirely future proof (well, you still have to be somewhat careful, just like anything) way of doing things that results in ultimately cleaner and easier to read code.
Is there something wrong with this?
[EDIT] For the record, I think RaveYard's posts are entirely appropriate, though, because the attitude isn't "lol just du this" but rather "eh, here's some things; would be best as a real feature though".
