Dumbworld - More Than Just Reviews Now

[Kontra Kommando]

You dodged my criticizing you demanding to be taken seriously despite the random pointless Pepe, my advisory that picking a fight in Everything Else was a fruitless endeavor from the get-go, and your turning a Doomworld spat into a freedom-of-speech tirade and apparently throwing your lot in with the in-crowd of the internet.

And I was just ATTEMPTING to clear things up for Weasel, positing a possible explanation for Tormentor's response. Why are YOU criticizing my attempt to explain his response besides to try and make me look foolish?

Dude, first of all, you don't even know the entire story behind what you are saying, other than what I have stated already. Also, what exactly is you definition of not dodging criticism? Do you expect people to capitulate to your demands, or something? I'm not demanding anything here, where the hell do you get off insinuating that?

You: "hey your website sucks"

Me:"okay"

I'm NOT going to remove the Pepe frog, because I think its funny to super-impose it over Doomguy's body.

Again, why do YOU feel the need to speak for someone else. I'm not trying to make you look like a fool, I'm simply addressing what you are saying here.

[Big C]

At this point I expect nothing from you because that seems to be about how much of my posts you're comprehending.

I wasn't speaking for him, just speculating. How many times do I have to say this?

If I sound upset it's because I've seen this same kind of censorship drama elsewhere and I've usually found both sides are utterly insufferable no matter how good or bad their cases are.

[Kontra Kommando]

At this point I expect nothing from you because that seems to be about how much of my posts you're comprehending.

I wasn't speaking for him, just speculating. How many times do I have to say this?

Oh so now you're speculating on someone else's behalf. Yea, that's a good idea. You have no idea what the person is trying to convey, so you just blurt out some non-sense, and add confusion to the thread. Maybe you wouldn't have to explain yourself so many times, had you not done that in the first place.

Also, now you're backing down, because I proved that you are just a loathing individual that didn't have much to say in the first place.

If I sound upset it's because I've seen this same kind of censorship drama elsewhere and I've usually found both sides are utterly insufferable no matter how good or bad their cases are.

Really, do you have any examples? Sorry if it makes you feel bad, but you're right to being comfortable all the time is not guaranteed.

[Big C]

That ad hominem was quite unnecessary and really pushing too far. At least I kept my own irritation aimed at your website and to a lesser extent some of your opinions/reactions.

If you want examples, look at the Ellen Pao debacle on Reddit---she was a terrible site manager, but apparently she was being set up to fail by her own bosses so they'd have a convenient scapegoat for a lot of other Reddit-related drama.

[Kontra Kommando]

That ad hominem was quite unnecessary. At least I kept my own irritation aimed at your website and to a lesser extent some of your opinions/reactions.

Okay its its perfectly fine for you to say I've been acting in an inane manner because of the website you are irritated by.

[Kontra Kommando]

If you want examples, look at the Ellen Pao debacle on Reddit---she was a terrible site manager, but apparently she was being set up to fail by her own bosses so they'd have a convenient scapegoat for a lot of other Reddit-related drama.

Well this is a separate incident from that completely.We were banned for talking about hot button issues that the mods didn't like. Thus we started a new place to talk about it; end of story. There's no conspiracies here.

[Big C]

I was criticizing your behavior, not YOU. You, on the other hand, called me "a loathing individual" and responded with needless sarcasm over my attempting to guess what Tormentor was saying.

And yeah, I get that's why you started your thread, but your behavior seems awfully similar to the kinds of people who are buying into "free speech" rhetoric on certain parts of 4chan and Reddit, and the Pepe logo is really sending an easily misinterpreted message given both those site's fondness for Pepe, especially 4chan's /r9k/ board which has gotten into the news lately because of the recent Oregon shooting.

[Kontra Kommando]

I was criticizing your behavior, not YOU. You, on the other hand, called me "a loathing individual" and responded with needless sarcasm over my attempting to guess what Tormentor was saying.

And yeah, I get that's why you started your thread, but your behavior seems awfully similar to the kinds of people who are buying into "free speech" rhetoric on certain parts of 4chan and Reddit, and the Pepe logo is really sending an easily misinterpreted message given both those site's fondness for Pepe, especially 4chan's /r9k/ board which has gotten into the news lately because of the recent Oregon shooting.

dude, what are you even turning this into? lol

Also, I'm criticizing your loathing behavior too. It would be different had I called you a fat ugly jerk, or a midget; that would be criticizing the individual.

[Big C]

Apparently you've put less thought into this than I thought you had.

Pay me no heed.

[Kontra Kommando]

Apparently you've put less thought into this than I thought you had.

Pay me no heed.

Honestly, I just think the pepe face is funny. There's no hidden agenda behind it.

[Big C]

Apparently you've put less thought into this than I thought you had.

Pay me no heed.

Honestly, I just think the pepe face is funny. There's no hidden agenda behind it.

I'll take your word for it.

[wildweasel]

Enough already.