Wiki

Hirogen2 · Post by **Hirogen2** » Mon Jan 05, 2004 2:12 pm

giest118: registering with any username from within a dynamic host and ban the whole world?

tyomitch · Post by **tyomitch** » Mon Jan 05, 2004 7:32 pm

If they put an unique chip in everyone's PC, banning malicious users would be much simpler.

arioch · Post by **arioch** » Mon Jan 05, 2004 7:36 pm

I'd settle for being able to verify e-mail addresses and banning them that way.

Signing up for extra e-mail addresses can be more of a royal pain in the ass than nearly all forum registration processes, and it's relatively simple to bar abusive free e-mail domains.

HotWax · Post by **HotWax** » Mon Jan 05, 2004 8:08 pm

How many problems have we had on the ZDoom forums, other than when Randy accidentally unset the news forum permissions? How many times has the one user (?) that has been banned come back in another form? Why should the wiki be any different?

Post by **Bio Hazard** » Mon Jan 05, 2004 8:13 pm

HotWax wrote:How many times has the one user (?) that has been banned come back in another form?

2 times

Nanami · Post by **Nanami** » Mon Jan 05, 2004 8:25 pm

Good stuff, good stuff. I added something yesterday and I'm going to make a start on the KEYCONF lump right now.

HotWax · Post by **HotWax** » Mon Jan 05, 2004 9:21 pm

Bio Hazard wrote:
HotWax wrote:How many times has the one user (?) that has been banned come back in another form?
2 times

And yet, the forum survives.

wildweasel · Post by **wildweasel** » Thu Jan 08, 2004 7:48 pm

Okay, added several new additions, filled in many of the blanks and finished up the About ZDoom and Lumps pages. I even wrote up placeholders for ATB Doom and NTDoom.

Post by **NiGHTMARE** » Sat Jan 10, 2004 10:18 am

I just added close to 40 wads on the "wads for ZDoom" page and added links for those that were missing them.

As writing that many descriptions would have taken me rather a long time, I've only added them for a few (e.g. Cyb's Zort series). If anyone desperately wants a particular wad to have a description, well then write it yourself!

arioch · Post by **arioch** » Sat Jan 10, 2004 11:04 am

Or link to the /idgames entry.

Post by **NiGHTMARE** » Sat Jan 10, 2004 11:29 am

That's what I've done. But I'm guessing that some people might want a description other than what the author wrote his/herself.

HotWax · Post by **HotWax** » Sat Jan 10, 2004 11:56 am

NiGHTMARE wrote:That's what I've done. But I'm guessing that some people might want a description other than what the author wrote his/herself.

Revised version:

That's what I've done. But I'm guessing that some people might want a description other than what the author wrote himself.

Post by **NiGHTMARE** » Sat Jan 10, 2004 12:13 pm

(his/her)self is also acceptable.

cccp_leha · Post by **cccp_leha** » Sat Jan 10, 2004 1:33 pm

Hehe, HotWax is referring to this.

HotWax · Post by **HotWax** » Sat Jan 10, 2004 8:57 pm

NiGHTMARE wrote:(his/her)self is also acceptable.

Yes, and himself (or hisself if you absolutely must) is the right way.

Wiki

Bringing the dead discussion to life again