Not that this mod is bad, by any means, but the real deal is different than this.
Hmmm... would this mod qualify as a demake of Doom 16?
edit: What if Sergeant Mark IV issues a C&D due to similarities between Doom 16, Brutal Doom, and D4D?

I would be real surprised if he has that kind of money.Doom 3 Doesnt Suck wrote:edit: What if Sergeant Mark IV issues a C&D due to similarities between Doom 16, Brutal Doom, and D4D?
You do realize this is a public thread, right?Gamer With Dignity wrote:That being said, the attention span of the internet is notoriously short. Whatever you do, do NOT let Bethesda find out that D4D is a superior competitor to Doom 4 that improves upon it in every possible way.
So you admit that SM4 would have a case... IF he had the money.Eruanna wrote:I would be real surprised if he has that kind of money.Doom 3 Doesnt Suck wrote:edit: What if Sergeant Mark IV issues a C&D due to similarities between Doom 16, Brutal Doom, and D4D?
Spoiler:
I never "admitted" anything - and I would very much appreciate you not putting words in my mouth like that.Doom 3 Doesnt Suck wrote:So you admit that SM4 would have a case... IF he had the money.
Eh, I swiped that image from imgur randomly... I couldn't find anything interesting.Eruanna wrote:I never "admitted" anything - and I would very much appreciate you not putting words in my mouth like that.Doom 3 Doesnt Suck wrote:So you admit that SM4 would have a case... IF he had the money.
All I said was I would be surprised if he has the kind of money to pull that off. Selling weed doesn't make the kind of money that requires - you're taking on a corporation here.
(Getting a little racist, I'd say...)Doom 3 Doesnt Suck wrote:Eh, I swiped that image from imgur randomly... I couldn't find anything interesting.Eruanna wrote:I never "admitted" anything - and I would very much appreciate you not putting words in my mouth like that.Doom 3 Doesnt Suck wrote:So you admit that SM4 would have a case... IF he had the money.
All I said was I would be surprised if he has the kind of money to pull that off. Selling weed doesn't make the kind of money that requires - you're taking on a corporation here.
But in the USA, frivolous lawsuits are considered a part of what we are. Without that, what would we be? Russia?
Unlike those psychos, we don't have our citizens "prepare" for a nuclear war. Most of our citizens know that the best response is to just lie down, close their eyes, and wait for death.
And our megawads for Doom are of better quality.
That did not stop Nintendo from going after AM2R...mutator wrote:You can not get into trouble for making doom 2 mod... The guns in this mod are way more different than guns in doom 2016 so you can't give it a possibility that this mod could get the developers in shit. Plus they are not charging you money for the mod they are making with the doom 2016 idea so they don't have any legal right to open court case on people that work for D4D mod..
Even if you open court case you got to have an evidence that you are right with your claim and with this situation Bethesda would fail miserably hardJohnnyTheWolf wrote:That did not stop Nintendo from going after AM2R...mutator wrote:You can not get into trouble for making doom 2 mod... The guns in this mod are way more different than guns in doom 2016 so you can't give it a possibility that this mod could get the developers in shit. Plus they are not charging you money for the mod they are making with the doom 2016 idea so they don't have any legal right to open court case on people that work for D4D mod..
No you're still required to go court I mean it will be illegal to not attend court if they are calling you over.. But if you know law well they can't really do jack shit to youJohnnyTheWolf wrote:Wait, so you are saying the AM2R team could have ignored Nintendo's cease and desist and continued to work on their game?
Issue a C&D over a mod of a game (said mod containing features that have been in the industry for nearly 20 years) to a company that owns the rights to the game he's modding, a mod that uses tons of code made by other people with resources ripped from other games and drawn by other artists, some even from other games owned by the company he's C&D'ing. Then issuing a C&D to a different mod not containing anything by him for a game he owns nothing of based on a game he owns nothing of for the sake of reclaiming lost income he doesn't get.Doom 3 Doesnt Suck wrote:edit: What if Sergeant Mark IV issues a C&D due to similarities between Doom 16, Brutal Doom, and D4D?
Money.Jaxxoon R wrote:Issue a C&D over a mod of a game (said mod containing features that have been in the industry for nearly 20 years) to a company that owns the rights to the game he's modding, a mod that uses tons of code made by other people with resources ripped from other games and drawn by other artists, some even from other games owned by the company he's C&D'ing. Then issuing a C&D to a different mod not containing anything by him for a game he owns nothing of based on a game he owns nothing of for the sake of reclaiming lost income he doesn't get.Doom 3 Doesnt Suck wrote:edit: What if Sergeant Mark IV issues a C&D due to similarities between Doom 16, Brutal Doom, and D4D?
What compels you to even?