PSA: Regarding Images Hosted on Photobucket

We sure do have a lot of rules and guidelines threads - find them all here, and please make sure you've read them! Also, community-wide announcements (that aren't major ZDoom News) go here as well.
User avatar
Kinsie
Posts: 7352
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 9:22 am
Graphics Processor: nVidia with Vulkan support
Location: MAP33

PSA: Regarding Images Hosted on Photobucket

Post by Kinsie »

As of earlier this week, Photobucket has updated its terms of service to remove the ability for free users to hotlink images (which is to say, to post Photobucket-hosted images on other sites, like here). This functionality is now locked behind a "PLUS 500" subscription plan, which is priced at US$400/year.

Photobucket images now look like this, as observed in the Russian Overkill thread:
TootsyBowl wrote:Uhm, guys, am I the only one who's seeing this in the OP?

Image
If you use Photobucket, please instead use a different image host, such as Imgur, or your own web hosting. If you have used Photobucket for images here recently, it would be VERY much appreciated if you could replace them so that your threads can remain legible.

Thanks!
User avatar
Enjay
 
 
Posts: 26440
Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2003 4:58 pm
Location: Scotland

Re: PSA: Regarding Images Hosted on Photobucket

Post by Enjay »

I'd actually just picked this up via another forum. I don't use Photobucket (I've always thought it to be an awkward and intrusive way to host pictures) but I was surprised when I saw people talking about the price. Seems very high for what they are offering, especially as it can be done for free elsewhere.
User avatar
Kinsie
Posts: 7352
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 9:22 am
Graphics Processor: nVidia with Vulkan support
Location: MAP33

Re: PSA: Regarding Images Hosted on Photobucket

Post by Kinsie »

Enjay wrote:I'd actually just picked this up via another forum. I don't use Photobucket (I've always thought it to be an awkward and intrusive way to host pictures) but I was surprised when I saw people talking about the price. Seems very high for what they are offering, especially as it can be done for free elsewhere.
Judging by the reactions spotted by El Reg, this is to capitalize on folks who have been using the service for a decade+, forcing them to cough up or effectively lose all their hotlinked images.
User avatar
Mikk-
Posts: 2272
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2009 1:31 pm
Location: Somewhere off Kanagawa

Re: PSA: Regarding Images Hosted on Photobucket

Post by Mikk- »

I quit using Photobucket years ago due to their bandwidth limit. Which if said limit is hit, all of your hotlinked photos would get nuked until you bought more bandwidth.
User avatar
Enjay
 
 
Posts: 26440
Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2003 4:58 pm
Location: Scotland

Re: PSA: Regarding Images Hosted on Photobucket

Post by Enjay »

Kinsie wrote:Judging by the reactions spotted by El Reg, this is to capitalize on folks who have been using the service for a decade+, forcing them to cough up or effectively lose all their hotlinked images.
Oh, I can see why they would do that. It's nasty, but I see the logic.
User avatar
Jimmy
 
 
Posts: 4717
Joined: Mon Apr 10, 2006 1:49 pm
Preferred Pronouns: He/Him

Re: PSA: Regarding Images Hosted on Photobucket

Post by Jimmy »

This is why I've always preferred imgur.

Heck I preferred imageshack over Photobucket 10 years ago.
AvzinElkein
Posts: 615
Joined: Wed Nov 17, 2010 6:35 pm

Re: PSA: Regarding Images Hosted on Photobucket

Post by AvzinElkein »

...and this is why I use imgur.
User avatar
Major Cooke
Posts: 8109
Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 3:55 pm

Re: PSA: Regarding Images Hosted on Photobucket

Post by Major Cooke »

Worse yet, they swarm you with ads like none other, making it all the more annoying to work with.
User avatar
xenoxols
Posts: 2125
Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2013 6:08 pm
Preferred Pronouns: She/Her
Location: Behind you

PhotoBucket breaks over a decade of images

Post by xenoxols »

Photobucket is now requiring its users to upgrade (from free to $399) before they can embed images. This applies to everything that has already been posted. Just look in the spriting carnival for evidence.
https://www.theverge.com/2017/7/4/15919 ... aid-update
http://lifehacker.com/back-up-your-phot ... 1796726043
User avatar
Rachael
Admin
Posts: 13203
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2004 1:31 pm
Preferred Pronouns: She/Her

Re: PhotoBucket breaks over a decade of images

Post by Rachael »

It happens with all image hosts. Either they feel they're losing too much money (in some cases, they're right), or they simply want to make more money. It'll happen with imgur too, down the line, and they'll just be replaced by something else.
Nevander
Posts: 2254
Joined: Mon Jan 06, 2014 11:32 pm

Re: PhotoBucket breaks over a decade of images

Post by Nevander »

Photobucket sucks anyway. They sucked for years before they did this, now they just mega-suck. I hope it doesn't happen to Imgur because they are really good.
User avatar
Project Shadowcat
Posts: 9369
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2005 8:33 pm
Operating System Version (Optional): Windows 10
Graphics Processor: nVidia with Vulkan support
Location: Blacksburg, SC USA

Re: PhotoBucket breaks over a decade of images

Post by Project Shadowcat »

$399 a year? Are they out of their minds?! Complete and total website hosting plans cost about 1/3rd that price and they include a domain name to go with it!
User avatar
Enjay
 
 
Posts: 26440
Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2003 4:58 pm
Location: Scotland

Re: PhotoBucket breaks over a decade of images

Post by Enjay »

As Kinsie said in the other thread...
Kinsie wrote:Judging by the reactions spotted by El Reg, this is to capitalize on folks who have been using the service for a decade+, forcing them to cough up or effectively lose all their hotlinked images.
User avatar
Rachael
Admin
Posts: 13203
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2004 1:31 pm
Preferred Pronouns: She/Her

Re: PhotoBucket breaks over a decade of images

Post by Rachael »

Yeah if there's another topic on it there's no reason for it to remain separate.

(Merge done, now)

Return to “Rules and Forum Announcements”