Fluidsynth demanding on older cpu's?

ZDoom LE, Pentium 133's, Windows 98, and DOS 3.1 all go here! A bygone era, of particular interest to some folks.
invictius
Posts: 393
Joined: Fri Aug 03, 2012 6:44 am

Fluidsynth demanding on older cpu's?

Post by invictius »

Have been using synths that require an application installation, which are unreliable in my experience so I tried this. The wiki says it's cpu-demanding but how much so? Too much for one of the later single core p4's?
User avatar
Rachael
Admin
Posts: 13079
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2004 1:31 pm
Preferred Pronouns: She/Her

Re: Fluidsynth demanding on older cpu's?

Post by Rachael »

Moved to legacy discussion.
User avatar
Graf Zahl
Lead GZDoom+Raze Developer
Lead GZDoom+Raze Developer
Posts: 48320
Joined: Sat Jul 19, 2003 10:19 am
Location: Germany

Re: Fluidsynth demanding on older cpu's?

Post by Graf Zahl »

Back in the day it got heavily criticized for being a CPU hog, but I cannot seem to find any numbers. It got added long after multi-core CPUs became commonplace, though.
User avatar
drfrag
Vintage GZDoom Developer
Posts: 3111
Joined: Fri Apr 23, 2004 3:51 am
Location: Spain

Re: Fluidsynth demanding on older cpu's?

Post by drfrag »

I don't know but it will be clearly slower than virtualmidisynth on that machine, just compare.
Gez
 
 
Posts: 17683
Joined: Fri Jul 06, 2007 3:22 pm

Re: Fluidsynth demanding on older cpu's?

Post by Gez »

Randi compared it to the other MIDI synth options that existed back then (like TiMidity) and it was sensibly slower on the single-core laptop it was tested on.

Return to “Legacy Discussion”