Wads that have taxed average pc in the last 10-15 years?

ZDoom LE, Pentium 133's, Windows 98, and DOS 3.1 all go here! A bygone era, of particular interest to some folks.
invictius
Posts: 393
Joined: Fri Aug 03, 2012 6:44 am

Wads that have taxed average pc in the last 10-15 years?

Post by invictius »

Back in the 90's readmes would say you need a fast 486 or pentium to run a certain wad but I can't think of anything over 15 years old that needed anything above what the average gamer had, apart from frozen time (which would run properly in prboom anyway). I think someone gave the example of phobos anomaly reborn on a 2001 system but that was made in 2006.
User avatar
Rachael
Admin
Posts: 13077
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2004 1:31 pm
Preferred Pronouns: She/Her

Re: Wads that have taxed average pc in the last 10-15 years?

Post by Rachael »

Stronghold and Paranoid are both approximately that age and made PC's of their time work very hard.
User avatar
Graf Zahl
Lead GZDoom+Raze Developer
Lead GZDoom+Raze Developer
Posts: 48320
Joined: Sat Jul 19, 2003 10:19 am
Location: Germany

Re: Wads that have taxed average pc in the last 10-15 years?

Post by Graf Zahl »

P:AR was released in 2001 as a 3 level teaser and in 2003 as a full episode. 2006 may have been a point release for bugfixing.
Back in the early years the crane in M3 certainly made some computers choke, the first time I was able to see that map with 60+ fps was with the computer I bought in 2007.
KDiZD is also a map set that taxed the systems of the time it was made in.
User avatar
FFFFRRRR
Posts: 99
Joined: Sat Nov 04, 2017 3:33 am

Re: Wads that have taxed average pc in the last 10-15 years?

Post by FFFFRRRR »

I feel like Sunder belongs on this list. Not for all maps, but some are certainly very heavy on performance. Map 9, 10, 11, 12 and 14 I believe.
I think its the mix of seeing a lot of sectors at the same time and a lot of monsters being active. Possibly, that is entirely intentional by the author.

Russian Overkills Superweapons might make some PCs stutter, too.

Return to “Legacy Discussion”