When did floating point performance become irrelevant?

ZDoom LE, Pentium 133's, Windows 98, and DOS 3.1 all go here! A bygone era, of particular interest to some folks.
invictius
Posts: 393
Joined: Fri Aug 03, 2012 6:44 am

When did floating point performance become irrelevant?

Post by invictius »

Someone said that with vanilla, amd cpus (486-k62) would give better performance than intel due to their floating point performance. Was this only for vanilla? And if not, what cpu's started making it irrelevant?
User avatar
Graf Zahl
Lead GZDoom+Raze Developer
Lead GZDoom+Raze Developer
Posts: 48358
Joined: Sat Jul 19, 2003 10:19 am
Location: Germany

Re: When did floating point performance become irrelevant?

Post by Graf Zahl »

It has mostly become irrelevant when the math coprocessors became standard equipment. Doom has been written right at the time when this wasn't the case. A first generation Pentium would have been more than suifficient to run a floating point version of the Doom engine.

Of course back then fixed point was indeed faster, but not by factors which would have made it a problem.

Return to “Legacy Discussion”