ZETH: Linedef 190 patch

Hirogen2 · Post by **Hirogen2** » Sun Oct 05, 2003 10:38 am

If this has not applied to ZETH yet, or for anybody who needs it, here is a diff patch that inserts the 190 linedef type.

Code: Select all

--- specialz.old        2003-10-05 18:35:48.000000000 +0200
+++ specialz.cfg        2003-10-04 20:21:22.000000000 +0200
@@ -6,6 +6,12 @@
 ##############################################################################
 ############################## Enumerations List #############################
 ##############################################################################
+"StaticInit"
+0,     "Gravity"
+1,     "Light/Fog"
+2,     "Damage"
+255,   "TextureSky"
+
 "Up/Down"
 0,     "Up"
 1,     "Down"
@@ -300,6 +306,7 @@
 224,   "Scroll_Ceiling",       "224 Scroll_Ceiling",
 999,"-","-","-----","-        ","-        ","-        ","-        ","-
 9,     "Line_Horizon",         "009 Line_Horizon",
+190,    "Static_Init",          "190 Static_Init",
 182,   "Line_Mirror",          "182 Line_Mirror",
 208,   "TranslucentLine",      "208 TranslucentLine",

Post by **Chris** » Sun Oct 05, 2003 11:27 pm

Applied.

Hirogen2 · Post by **Hirogen2** » Mon Oct 06, 2003 5:55 am

I hope any changes get backported to DOS Zeth too, just in case...

Post by **Chris** » Tue Oct 07, 2003 1:16 am

The code I have should still compile under DJGPP, but unfortunately I can't test it now that I'm on Win2K, and Win98 won't recognize the FAT32 partition where the code is..

Hirogen2 · Post by **Hirogen2** » Tue Oct 07, 2003 5:27 am

What? Impossible. Win98 itself uses FAT32. Did you probably mean Win98 doesnot support NTFS? Or W2K doesnot support VFAT/FAT32(which is unlikely)?

Post by **Chris** » Tue Oct 07, 2003 9:13 pm

For some reason, Win98 detects my FAT32 fat table as corrupt, and a dir listing confirms that. However Win2K sees it just fine, and scandisk turns up nothing. What's the size limit on a FAT32 partition, or for a single file on a FAT32 partition, btw? It's been running fine until I put 2K on, and the partition in question hasn't changed, except it's a lot more full now..

Though I find it odd that Win98 refuses to boot up because of a bad partition that it's not even on..

Cyb · Post by **Cyb** » Tue Oct 07, 2003 10:34 pm

hehe win98 sux : P

Hirogen2 · Post by **Hirogen2** » Wed Oct 08, 2003 5:30 am

Cyb wrote:hehe win98 sux : P

So does XP.
Limit on VFAT/FAT32 is at least more than 40GB.

Post by **Chris** » Wed Oct 08, 2003 6:21 am

The biggest file on the partition is 713MB. The partition itself is about 12GB. Having some folders shared for a LAN wouldn't mess it up, would it?

Hirogen2 · Post by **Hirogen2** » Wed Oct 08, 2003 2:07 pm

No, so far I know not. I had friends who gave all space to a Windows parition
because they had not the Linux CDs yet, and well... giving all 38GB to a FAT32
partition à la Win98. The biggest file, however is the usual 2.147GB (2^31).
Why should it create network problems? 713MB is not much, just an ISO.
Then again, I do not have one 713MB files but loads of 1KB files of splitted
IWADs

works fine. Takes long.

Post by **Chris** » Wed Oct 08, 2003 3:51 pm

Why should it create network problems?

Not network problems, but file system problems. I don't know much about networking so I don't know if the "shared" attribute is an internal Windows setting, or if it's set in the file system. And if it's set in the file system, I could see why Win98 might not like that.

Post by **randi** » Wed Oct 08, 2003 3:58 pm

Have you tried running chkdsk under 2000:

Code: Select all

chkdsk c: /f

I believe the sharing information is stored in the registry.

Hirogen2 wrote:
Cyb wrote:hehe win98 sux : P
So does XP.

So does Linux.

Oh no! Forget I said that. I did not mean to dis the perfect OS!

bimshwel · Post by **bimshwel** » Thu Oct 09, 2003 10:05 am

Fight the power!

Hirogen2 · Post by **Hirogen2** » Thu Oct 09, 2003 12:33 pm

So does Linux.
Oh no! Forget I said that. I did not mean to dis the perfect OS!

I hope so for you!
BTW if you do not want to port it back over to Linux, either by laziness or
non-interest, you might consider hiring someone using Sourceforge's "Help
Wanted" system. Of course it's free in every aspect(tm)

HotWax · Post by **HotWax** » Fri Oct 10, 2003 3:30 am

Hirogen2 wrote:
So does Linux.
Oh no! Forget I said that. I did not mean to dis the perfect OS!
I hope so for you!
BTW if you do not want to port it back over to Linux, either by laziness or
non-interest, you might consider hiring someone using Sourceforge's "Help
Wanted" system. Of course it's free in every aspect(tm)

Or he could just make the source available so anyone who is "not lazy" and is "interested" could do their own damn port.

Wait a minute...