WidePix v1.0 released with GZDoom 4.5!

For high-res texture/sprite projects, sprite-fix patches, music add-ons, music randomizers, and other graphic/sound-only projects.
Forum rules
The Projects forums are ONLY for YOUR PROJECTS! If you are asking questions about a project, either find that project's thread, or start a thread in the General section instead.

Got a cool project idea but nothing else? Put it in the project ideas thread instead!

Projects for any Doom-based engine (especially 3DGE) are perfectly acceptable here too.

Please read the full rules for more details.

Re: [WIP] WidePix: 16:9/21:9 Graphics Replacement Project

Postby Scuba Steve » Thu Mar 19, 2020 8:44 pm

After some pixel pushing and serious chopping... I think I have a serviceable Plutonia Titlescreen that does not mess with the 4:3 image. It's not as nice as the other... but it fits the project more accurately. I'll add it to the google drive with all the others.

Now the only edited image is TNT interpic that removed a single pixel black border.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Scuba Steve
 
Joined: 27 Mar 2004

Re: [WIP] WidePix: 16:9/21:9 Graphics Replacement Project

Postby Tormentor667 » Sat Mar 21, 2020 4:04 am

I really think that this should be added as a standard package to GZDoom. Can someone point the developers to this?
User avatar
Tormentor667
needs more detail
 
Joined: 16 Jul 2003
Location: Germany

Re: [WIP] WidePix: 16:9/21:9 Graphics Replacement Project

Postby Rachael » Sat Mar 21, 2020 6:32 am

Tormentor667 wrote:I really think that this should be added as a standard package to GZDoom. Can someone point the developers to this?

Am already aware of this. If that's really a common desire, then we'll have to see how Graf thinks, but let's wait until it's finished.
User avatar
Rachael
Webmaster
 
Joined: 13 Jan 2004
Discord: Rachael#3767
Twitch ID: madamerachelle
Github ID: madame-rachelle
Operating System: Windows 10/8.1/8/201x 64-bit
OS Test Version: No (Using Stable Public Version)
Graphics Processor: nVidia with Vulkan support

Re: [WIP] WidePix: 16:9/21:9 Graphics Replacement Project

Postby Nash » Sat Mar 21, 2020 7:09 am

The feature itself still has some issues (there's one open issue still, and I haven't checked all of the 2D screens, and lastly I have no idea how to correctly handle the bunny scroller (it's also glitchy last I checked))
User avatar
Nash
 
 
 
Joined: 27 Oct 2003
Location: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Github ID: nashmuhandes

Re: [WIP] WidePix: 16:9/21:9 Graphics Replacement Project

Postby dmslr » Sat Mar 21, 2020 12:59 pm

How about the widescreen statusbar (like this) included in this mod?
dmslr
 
Joined: 06 Aug 2019

Re: [WIP] WidePix: 16:9/21:9 Graphics Replacement Project

Postby Tormentor667 » Sat Mar 21, 2020 1:45 pm

dmslr wrote:How about the widescreen statusbar (like this) included in this mod?

I agree here as well
User avatar
Tormentor667
needs more detail
 
Joined: 16 Jul 2003
Location: Germany

Re: [WIP] WidePix: 16:9/21:9 Graphics Replacement Project

Postby Nash » Sat Mar 21, 2020 2:16 pm

Okay so umm... I just came to the realization that I may have gotten the size incorrect for 21:9. Is it really 474x200?

Actually are these numbers even correct? I want to know the exact dimensions needed to make sure the graphics scale cleanly to cover the pillarboxes.

320x200 -> 16:9 -> 426x200
320x200 -> 21:9 -> 474x200
User avatar
Nash
 
 
 
Joined: 27 Oct 2003
Location: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Github ID: nashmuhandes

Re: [WIP] WidePix: 16:9/21:9 Graphics Replacement Project

Postby Gez » Sat Mar 21, 2020 2:31 pm

If we say that 320x200 is 4:3 (it's 16:10, but then it's aspect-corrected by being stretched vertically 20%, ending at 16:12, which is 4:3), then we can simply say that 4:3 is the same thing as 12:9. Now we can compare just the width, since 200 with ARC is 9.
320 is 12. 320/12 = 26⅔
26⅔ × 16 = 426⅔ -- to be safe you could round up to 427.
26⅔ × 21 = 560 -- and since 21 is a multiple of 3, we get a round number, hurray.

So for 21:9 pics, you need 560x200.
Gez
 
 
 
Joined: 06 Jul 2007

Re: [WIP] WidePix: 16:9/21:9 Graphics Replacement Project

Postby Nash » Sat Mar 21, 2020 2:37 pm

And what about 16:9? Is 426x200 correct? Sorry I need the answer spoonfed to me, I'm not exactly known for being good at maths... I just want to avoid doing wasted artwork... :oops:
User avatar
Nash
 
 
 
Joined: 27 Oct 2003
Location: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Github ID: nashmuhandes

Re: [WIP] WidePix: 16:9/21:9 Graphics Replacement Project

Postby drfrag » Sat Mar 21, 2020 2:39 pm

356x200?
Last edited by drfrag on Sat Mar 21, 2020 2:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
drfrag
Os voy a romper a pedazos!
Vintage GZDoom Developer
 
Joined: 23 Apr 2004
Location: Spain
Discord: drfrag#3555
Github ID: drfrag666

Re: [WIP] WidePix: 16:9/21:9 Graphics Replacement Project

Postby Gez » Sat Mar 21, 2020 2:42 pm

Technically you need 426⅔x200 to have a true 16:9, so it's up to you if that ⅔ should be rounded up to 427 or down to 426.

That's what my lines were about. If you consider that 320x200 stretched to 320x240 is 12:9 (4:3, where you multiply both factors by 3 so they're kept proportional), then you have only one value to keep track of, that's the width.
12:9 -> 320
16:9 -> 426⅔
21:9 -> 560
32:9 -> 853⅓


drfrag wrote:356x200


13.35:9?
Last edited by Gez on Sat Mar 21, 2020 2:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Gez
 
 
 
Joined: 06 Jul 2007

Re: [WIP] WidePix: 16:9/21:9 Graphics Replacement Project

Postby Nash » Sat Mar 21, 2020 2:45 pm

Okay great, so it looks like I only got the size wrong for 21:9. Scuba Steve gonna be mad. :P Steve, if you feel it's too much trouble, that's okay - I can take whatever we already have now and just extend them further. But yeah, I insist on making this pack 21:9-accurate because if I only make it 16:9 accurate, someone who plays on ultrawide will complain. So might as well do the work up front.

I wonder if this is also why WidePix scales weirdly on 16:9...
User avatar
Nash
 
 
 
Joined: 27 Oct 2003
Location: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Github ID: nashmuhandes

Re: [WIP] WidePix: 16:9/21:9 Graphics Replacement Project

Postby drfrag » Sat Mar 21, 2020 2:48 pm

This is not that simple then. 16:9 = 1.7777... 356:200 = 1.78 :?
Now i see you need that for aspect correction but the screen resolution is 356.
User avatar
drfrag
Os voy a romper a pedazos!
Vintage GZDoom Developer
 
Joined: 23 Apr 2004
Location: Spain
Discord: drfrag#3555
Github ID: drfrag666

Re: [WIP] WidePix: 16:9/21:9 Graphics Replacement Project

Postby dmslr » Sat Mar 21, 2020 2:51 pm

drfrag, you have to consider aspect ratio correction.
dmslr
 
Joined: 06 Aug 2019

Re: [WIP] WidePix: 16:9/21:9 Graphics Replacement Project

Postby drfrag » Sat Mar 21, 2020 2:53 pm

Yeah i saw that and edited my post.
Tormentor667 wrote:I really think that this should be added as a standard package to GZDoom.

Any possible license issue?
User avatar
drfrag
Os voy a romper a pedazos!
Vintage GZDoom Developer
 
Joined: 23 Apr 2004
Location: Spain
Discord: drfrag#3555
Github ID: drfrag666

PreviousNext

Return to Graphic/Audio Patches

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest