A friend was trying to test La Tailor Girl w/ newer SVNs of GZDoom [friend is saying it's 3.7pre-733 where it starts], but the POWERSPEED.NOTRAIL flags seems to have gone missing in general from the port. Someone over on the Discord thinks it has to do with the "ItemFlag Scriptifcation" and asked me to report it here.
- screenshot given by my friend of the error occuring on 3.7pre-906
[3.7pre-906] POWERSPEED.NOTRAIL flag [maybe others] missing
Moderator: GZDoom Developers
Forum rules
Please don't bump threads here if you have a problem - it will often be forgotten about if you do. Instead, make a new thread here.
Please don't bump threads here if you have a problem - it will often be forgotten about if you do. Instead, make a new thread here.
- Lord Misfit
- Posts: 221
- Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 8:13 pm
- Preferred Pronouns: He/Him
- Graphics Processor: nVidia with Vulkan support
- Location: Canton, OH
- Contact:
Re: [3.7pre-906] POWERSPEED.NOTRAIL flag [maybe others] miss
It's only NOTRAIL missing because its hard-coded processing were removed in 5e4b366. The question is how should 'that lone flag' be handled now?
- Graf Zahl
- Lead GZDoom+Raze Developer
- Posts: 49067
- Joined: Sat Jul 19, 2003 10:19 am
- Location: Germany
Re: [3.7pre-906] POWERSPEED.NOTRAIL flag [maybe others] miss
I already added a flagdef for it, but haven't checked yet why this doesn't work here. All other flagdefs do.
Re: [3.7pre-906] POWERSPEED.NOTRAIL flag [maybe others] miss
The flag cannot be not found because it is set in PowerupGiver instead of PowerSpeed class.
- Graf Zahl
- Lead GZDoom+Raze Developer
- Posts: 49067
- Joined: Sat Jul 19, 2003 10:19 am
- Location: Germany
Re: [3.7pre-906] POWERSPEED.NOTRAIL flag [maybe others] miss
Like I said, I haven't looked into it yet. That explains it.
- Graf Zahl
- Lead GZDoom+Raze Developer
- Posts: 49067
- Joined: Sat Jul 19, 2003 10:19 am
- Location: Germany
Re: [3.7pre-906] POWERSPEED.NOTRAIL flag [maybe others] miss
OK then. This looks like a modding error that just never got reported but was silently ignored instead. On the item where it is placed it had no effect and should have aborted even in older versions.
The main question now is: Is this an actively developed mod? If so it should be fixed there, because all I can do here is to add some crutches to make something pass the parser that is clearly not correct, biut that's not really beneficial for future robustness.
Like the name implies, this flag belongs to the PowerSpeed flag and won't do anything if set elsewhere, and most certainly won't be transferred to a given PowerSpeed item.
The main question now is: Is this an actively developed mod? If so it should be fixed there, because all I can do here is to add some crutches to make something pass the parser that is clearly not correct, biut that's not really beneficial for future robustness.
Like the name implies, this flag belongs to the PowerSpeed flag and won't do anything if set elsewhere, and most certainly won't be transferred to a given PowerSpeed item.