GDX Discussions
-
- Posts: 110
- Joined: Sat Mar 21, 2009 11:19 am
GDX Discussions
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EGNceD_LHTU
Developer of BloodGDX is making of WitchhavenGDX port.
Developer of BloodGDX is making of WitchhavenGDX port.
-
- Posts: 441
- Joined: Sun May 28, 2017 1:01 pm
Re: Operation Body Count - Version 1.0 Release!
And Tekwar. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d2FppYQlgLEZaratul wrote:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EGNceD_LHTU
Developer of BloodGDX is making of WitchhavenGDX port.
-
- Posts: 306
- Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2017 10:04 am
- Location: Dryer lint trap
Re: Operation Body Count - Version 1.0 Release!
Finally! Yes! Thank you for showing this to me!Zaratul wrote:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EGNceD_LHTU
Developer of BloodGDX is making of WitchhavenGDX port.
-
- Posts: 13793
- Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2004 1:31 pm
- Preferred Pronouns: She/Her
Re: GDX Discussions
Split from the Operation Body Count thread.
-
- Posts: 306
- Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2017 10:04 am
- Location: Dryer lint trap
Re: GDX Discussions
Good move, in case this continues. Anyways, anyone know if these GDX's are going to fix the issues of the games and balance the gameplay, or are they just creating a 1:1 port?
-
- Posts: 912
- Joined: Sun Aug 16, 2015 11:52 pm
Re: GDX Discussions
I'm excited about this actually. Never played Tekwar, don't like fiddling with Dosbox, and this looks like maybe it'd fix some of the engine issues as well.
EttinGrinder also has a patch for Witchaven you use with dosbox to fix a lot of the game's bugs and design flaws.
EttinGrinder also has a patch for Witchaven you use with dosbox to fix a lot of the game's bugs and design flaws.
-
- Posts: 306
- Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2017 10:04 am
- Location: Dryer lint trap
Re: GDX Discussions
Oooo, that looks like a really nice port! That might give me a reason to fuck with dosbox
-
- Posts: 2425
- Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2010 4:47 pm
- Location: Behind You
Re: GDX Discussions
Witchhaven gave me diarrhea, not sure if I want to go through that again.Zaratul wrote:WitchhavenGDX port.
-
- Posts: 110
- Joined: Sat Mar 21, 2009 11:19 am
Re: GDX Discussions
First part of Witchhaven was not bad,it has many problems but overall was good-ish.But second part is truly awful.
-
- Posts: 2425
- Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2010 4:47 pm
- Location: Behind You
Re: GDX Discussions
I never played he second part, but the first one was so bad it gave me diarrhea for a whole week.Zaratul wrote:First part of Witchhaven was not bad,it has many problems but overall was good-ish.But second part is truly awful.
-
- Posts: 371
- Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2011 8:42 pm
- Location: Indonesia
Re: Operation Body Count - Version 1.0 Release!
It's not active though. Just one release version, and that's it.Korell wrote:And Tekwar. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d2FppYQlgLE
Hopefully the author releases a new version of it.
-
- Posts: 2816
- Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2015 9:07 pm
- Preferred Pronouns: He/Him
- Location: Killing spiders.
Re: GDX Discussions
It looks like future versions of Blood GDX will finally make it possible for modders to create and add custom items, instead of editing existing ones.
Does anyone knows if this is true?
Does anyone knows if this is true?
-
- Posts: 4449
- Joined: Sun May 30, 2004 10:16 am
- Preferred Pronouns: She/Her
- Location: GNU/Hell
Re: GDX Discussions
Probably not as the point of GDX is to abstract compiled x86 assembly code directly.through Java. In another way it's not a "ugh its java" slow port one would expect either.
-
- Posts: 110
- Joined: Sat Mar 21, 2009 11:19 am
-
-
- Posts: 12328
- Joined: Tue Jul 21, 2009 12:04 pm
- Preferred Pronouns: He/Him
- Operating System Version (Optional): Windows 11
- Graphics Processor: nVidia with Vulkan support
- Location: capital N, capital S, no space
Re: GDX Discussions
Apparently this author has also done a Java recreation of DukeRes. Nice.