Welcome to the ZDoom Forums!

Just a heads up, we pushed a minor fix for Linux since some distros were having issues using the AppImage + renamed the file names to be more readable.

Exl wrote: ↑Sat Nov 08, 2025 2:23 am Hell yeah, congrats!

First tiny bit of feedback, is it possible to make the version number part of the package filename? "Windows--x86_64.zip" could be anything...

Yeah, I'll add the versioning into the full release.

This is a pre-release thread for 4.14.3. If you wish to test the upcoming 4.14.3 build and give feedback, this can be done here. This thread will contain all pre-release builds for 4.14.3 and will be updated when new ones are available. Current Version: Release Candidate 1 Downloads Windows Linux ...

UZDoom won't have its own independent site, it'll be hosted here at zdoom.org (similar to GZDoom and LZDoom). Any kind of outside site purporting to be for UZDoom isn't to be trusted.

Recently it has come to our attention that, amidst what's happening right now, some people are creating websites claiming to be for Ultimate ZDoom. These are not official websites for UZDoom as UZDoom will be hosted here at zdoom.org with the GitHub repo ( alternative link ) being the only official ...

this will be fixed for the 4.14.3 release, but isn't yet in devbuilds, i wouldn't recommend switching away from gzdoom 4.14.2 for regular play until that release I'd figure since I already have a dev build downloaded from GitHub that I might as well use it. I will download a dev build when it ...

If you're going straight from 4.14.3 -> 5.0, will the UZDoom 5.0 release incorporate anticipated features in the upcoming GZDoom 4.15 release? It's exciting to see a more useful packet-server mode in the ZDoom upstream that could be adapted to a dedicated server configuration. I'd hate to see this ...

the zdoom github org on the other hand, is owned by graf unfortunately, which is why uzdoom is on its own org Kinda. iirc everyone listed is an owner, but most of them don't even work on GZDoom anymore and haven't for a while. The whole situation with it felt really odd so it was probably more ...

axredneck wrote: ↑Thu Oct 23, 2025 11:52 am Will it affect Raze?

There are no plans to affect Raze, but that will ultimately be up to Graf. We will continue to support everything it needs.

Graf has been away for a bit due to a lot of real life work so we've been the ones largely spearheading its direction for the past year or so. We can also pull in any changes from GZDoom as needed, but we'd like to set up a more self sustaining model for the future of the project. Ideally it's a ...

Well that can't be good lmao. Profiles are an interesting idea. We had some thoughts for a few presets (Vanilla, Modern, etc.) but it'd be cool if you could make your own. The menu is in desperate need of cleaning up so I think that'd be around the time I could look into adding something like that.

Okay, I have one question. Why is the new UZDoom version planned to be 4.14.3 and not a 4.15 or 4.16? After all, 4.15 is the current development version, and there are many changes coming, so it would only make sense to continue at a higher version number, IMO. Main reason is that this release ...

To clarify, we're actually defaulting the filtering to None (Trilinear) since in our experience we feel this is the best balance. Crisp pixels up close and on the HUD/weapons, filtered pixels at a distance so it doesn't turn into unreadable mush. We're gonna be tweaking a few other defaults, but all ...

https://forum.zdoom.org/viewtopic.php?p=1263453#p1263453 My view, unless I am wrong in which case I will apologize, is that there is an important difference. The transitions from ZDoom and QZDoom to GZDoom were amicable, at least at the time. Whereas the transition to UZDoom seems more predatory ...

Fixed a small typo that was pointed out, thanks Enjay