The Future

Shadelight · Post by **Shadelight** » Fri Oct 21, 2005 6:04 pm

IMPressive Scripting Edition?

HobbsTiger1 · Post by **HobbsTiger1** » Fri Oct 21, 2005 6:13 pm

You're an acronym theif again. Check TDA's post on page 3.

DoomRater · Post by **DoomRater** » Fri Oct 21, 2005 7:41 pm

Weapons and Tactics Research (WATR)

At first I didn't really care what it's called but this just seems cool.

Shadelight · Post by **Shadelight** » Fri Oct 21, 2005 8:03 pm

CYBERnetic Scripting Expectacular?

jallamann · Post by **jallamann** » Fri Oct 21, 2005 8:11 pm

KingofFlames:
Stop These Fucking Underintelligent suggestions

deathz0r · Post by **deathz0r** » Fri Oct 21, 2005 8:55 pm

jallamann wrote:KingofFlames:
Stop These Fucking Underintelligent suggestions

You've got my vote right there.

insertwackynamehere · Fri Oct 21, 2005 10:34 pm

ZDoom Additional Actor Class Scripting Language

ZDAACSL

Phobus · Post by **Phobus** » Sat Oct 22, 2005 1:52 am

Why not just something simple that covers a lot? Like ZScript or ZCode?

Doomguy0505 · Post by **Doomguy0505** » Sat Oct 22, 2005 3:14 am

deathz0r wrote:
jallamann wrote:KingofFlames:
Stop These Fucking Underintelligent suggestions
You've got my vote right there.

Seconded.

Post by **Graf Zahl** » Sat Oct 22, 2005 4:56 am

Reminds me of:

http://forum.drdteam.org/viewtopic.php?t=280

And look how that thread ended. Hint: If you don't have anything useful to contribute, please remain silent.

Sphagne · Post by **Sphagne** » Sat Oct 22, 2005 9:41 pm

Randy, I hope in this new code we can have complete use of different types of variables available, and how about variable types that could keep a refference of other actors, so that we could access their functionalities and properties directly, and could order them around and check their action states, and health and so on...

How about being able to define our new properties for our actors and be able to make meaningful use of them like adding Intelligence factor and being able to use access new internal variables in ACS and check them from other actors' definition codes...?

By the way, dont you want to take a look at my other old suggestions about DECORATE? Maybe they are easier to implement in this new code?

Cheero!

Cutmanmike · Post by **Cutmanmike** » Tue Oct 25, 2005 7:15 am

Who cares about the name as long as it does the job!

justin024 · Post by **justin024** » Tue Oct 25, 2005 10:45 am

If it supports C style loops and multi dimensional arrays (which it should):

CDoom

It would be very cool if it could be plain-text. It seems that it would be pointless to make it capable of doing things acs can already do.

jallamann · Post by **jallamann** » Tue Oct 25, 2005 11:33 am

justin024 wrote:CDoom

That's already the name of a source port.

Doomguy0505 · Post by **Doomguy0505** » Wed Oct 26, 2005 6:35 am

how about STFUACRONYMS?
[/sarcasm]

Maybe a new language like C but instead use Z and then maybe get to Z++