[KDiZD] Community Information Thread (Update Page 18)

Discuss anything ZDoom-related that doesn't fall into one of the other categories.
User avatar
jallamann
Posts: 2271
Joined: Mon May 24, 2004 8:25 am
Location: Ålesund, Norway

Post by jallamann »

kc32 wrote:That's assuming they actually get 56K transfers. 7Kbps is more realistic for dialup.
Ummmm...
56 kilobaud modem
/ 8
= 7 kilobytes per second

So, yes. It's very realistic, because a V90 modem will be able to use all the available speed up 'till this level.
User avatar
kc32
Posts: 117
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 10:57 am
Location: One of the smarter parts of Kansas

Post by kc32 »

Kbps not KBps. There's a difference, and that's about the speed I had with dialup. Thank god for cable modems.
User avatar
Zarggg
Posts: 108
Joined: Wed Jul 28, 2004 5:08 pm
Location: easton.pa.us

Post by Zarggg »

kc32 wrote:That's assuming they actually get 56K transfers. 7Kbps is more realistic for dialup.
I sincerely hope you don't mean 7 kilobits.
User avatar
TheDarkArchon
Posts: 7656
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 5:14 am
Location: Some cold place

Post by TheDarkArchon »

jallamann wrote:
kc32 wrote:That's assuming they actually get 56K transfers. 7Kbps is more realistic for dialup.
Ummmm...
56 kilobaud modem
/ 8
= 7 kilobytes per second

So, yes. It's very realistic, because a V90 modem will be able to use all the available speed up 'till this level.
I somehow once got 9KB/s from HOTU on dial-up. Most of the time it was 4.4KB/s.
User avatar
Chris
Posts: 2958
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2003 12:07 am
Graphics Processor: ATI/AMD with Vulkan/Metal Support

Post by Chris »

If you have data compression on, you can get some data (mostly text) faster. If something compresses better as it's sent to to, you'll get a higher throughput (which is why compressed archives don't really ever go that fast over dialup, as opposed to text pages.. the modem can't compress it any further).
User avatar
TheDarkArchon
Posts: 7656
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 5:14 am
Location: Some cold place

Post by TheDarkArchon »

It had compression on. The file was STRIFE1.WAD.
User avatar
kc32
Posts: 117
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 10:57 am
Location: One of the smarter parts of Kansas

Post by kc32 »

Zarggg wrote:
kc32 wrote:That's assuming they actually get 56K transfers. 7Kbps is more realistic for dialup.
I sincerely hope you don't mean 7 kilobits.
Sorry, but yes, at least when I used it. But this was around 5 years ago before I got a cable modem. I'm never going back. EVER.
User avatar
Kristus
Posts: 437
Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2005 4:02 am
Location: Bed

Post by Kristus »

He means, you must mean 7 Kilobytes
User avatar
Chris
Posts: 2958
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2003 12:07 am
Graphics Processor: ATI/AMD with Vulkan/Metal Support

Post by Chris »

TheDarkArchon wrote:It had compression on. The file was STRIFE1.WAD.
That would explain it. WAD files aren't compressed, so your modem's compression would help transfer faster.
User avatar
deathz0r
Posts: 353
Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2003 4:09 pm
Graphics Processor: ATI/AMD with Vulkan/Metal Support
Location: Land with them kangaroo

Post by deathz0r »

Screenshots don't work for me. I guess that's a good thing.
User avatar
GeeDougg
Posts: 3651
Joined: Fri Jul 16, 2004 2:39 pm
Location: VanCity, British Colonies, Isolated Republic Of Canuckistan

Post by GeeDougg »

jallamann wrote:
kc32 wrote:That's assuming they actually get 56K transfers. 7Kbps is more realistic for dialup.
Ummmm...
56 kilobaud modem
/ 8
= 7 kilobytes per second

So, yes. It's very realistic, because a V90 modem will be able to use all the available speed up 'till this level.
[useless-info]It may interest you to know the true speed of a "56K" modem is actually 57.6Kbps (7.2KBps).... [/useless-info]

__________________________________
Machinae Supremacy - Redeemer Trailer
User avatar
Chris
Posts: 2958
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2003 12:07 am
Graphics Processor: ATI/AMD with Vulkan/Metal Support

Post by Chris »

[useless-info]It may interest you to know the true speed of a "56K" modem is actually 57.6Kbps (7.2KBps).... [/useless-info]
[useful-info]The true max connection speed of a 56k modem is actually closer to 53 or 54k, due to FCC power regulations for phone lines.[/useful-info]
User avatar
Bio Hazard
Posts: 4019
Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2003 8:15 pm
Location: ferret ~/C/ZDL $

Post by Bio Hazard »

Chris wrote:[useful-info]The true max connection speed of a 56k modem is actually closer to 53 or 54k, due to FCC power regulations for phone lines.[/useful-info]
[useless-info]In the united states...[/useless-info]
User avatar
Tormentor667
Posts: 13549
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2003 3:52 am
Preferred Pronouns: He/Him
Operating System Version (Optional): Windows 11
Graphics Processor: nVidia (Modern GZDoom)
Location: Germany

Post by Tormentor667 »

My account's bandwidth limit is expired. Just wait a few days, reset is soon ;)
User avatar
GeeDougg
Posts: 3651
Joined: Fri Jul 16, 2004 2:39 pm
Location: VanCity, British Colonies, Isolated Republic Of Canuckistan

Post by GeeDougg »

Chris wrote:
[useless-info]It may interest you to know the true speed of a "56K" modem is actually 57.6Kbps (7.2KBps).... [/useless-info]
[useful-info]The true max connection speed of a 56k modem is actually closer to 53 or 54k, due to FCC power regulations for phone lines.[/useful-info]
I think that's only in the U.S. though, as Bio Hazard said (and maybe in Canada too).

Return to “General”