zdoom is cool
-
- Posts: 10002
- Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2003 6:18 pm
- Location: Idaho Falls, ID
-
- Posts: 2033
- Joined: Sat Jul 19, 2003 6:15 am
- Operating System Version (Optional): Tumbleweed x64
- Graphics Processor: Intel with Vulkan/Metal Support
- Location: Central Germany
-
- Posts: 888
- Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2003 3:45 am
- Location: Stuffed in your ass
Is the following statement any stronger " Probably the anti-activationist lusers spreading misinformation"?, I repeat, is it?. I highly doubt it, even worse, you're taking just a lil phrase, forgetting the rest of the explanation where it was taken from, perhaps like trying to avoid the facts revealing the weak nature of your only point that translates as "XP is more stable", which btw, I agreed. Want true memory handling?, try linux and stop glorifying things before you get an overall taste.HotWax wrote:Pop quiz!
How can you tell when you've won an argument?
When the only way your opponent can respond to your valid points is with baseless accusations and comments such as "winxp's dos sucks" and "Bill Gates blows".
im not saying my opinion, im saying the facts, i used to run duke3d under win98, now i cant under winxp.
its not because winxp "can close a program without losing system stability"
since 80386 we were able to do that, only microsoft delayed 15 years.
I WANNA PLAY MY DOS GAMES LIKE BEFORE AND I CANT ANYMORE SO SOMETHING IS WRONG
its not because winxp "can close a program without losing system stability"
since 80386 we were able to do that, only microsoft delayed 15 years.
I WANNA PLAY MY DOS GAMES LIKE BEFORE AND I CANT ANYMORE SO SOMETHING IS WRONG
-
- Posts: 2033
- Joined: Sat Jul 19, 2003 6:15 am
- Operating System Version (Optional): Tumbleweed x64
- Graphics Processor: Intel with Vulkan/Metal Support
- Location: Central Germany
-
- Posts: 888
- Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2003 3:45 am
- Location: Stuffed in your ass
-
- Posts: 1061
- Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2003 5:29 pm
- Location: Monrovia, CA, USA
Have you tried the things explained on this site?Seyss wrote:I WANNA PLAY MY DOS GAMES LIKE BEFORE AND I CANT ANYMORE SO SOMETHING IS WRONG
http://www.dosgames.com/xphints.php
-
- Posts: 1113
- Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2003 8:53 am
- Location: Perth, Western Australia
The facts?Seyss wrote:im not saying my opinion, im saying the facts, ...
You mean like the following:
Just sit down, be quiet, and LISTEN to yourself for just a moment.Seyss wrote:the truth is that winxp's dos sucks, and they did that on purpose to screw up dos programs.
Now, why would Microsoft go to all that trouble to deliberately make it harder for some people to use XP for a particular purpose? What's in it for them?
Oh. How silly of me. I should have guessed. There's a major conspiracy amongst the games publishers to bribe Microsoft into making XP unable to run older DOS games, just to force users to buy newer games!
All sarcasm aside, I can think of no benefit accruing to Microsoft that would make them deliberately prevent users from running DOS programs. At the time of XP's release, there would have been a very small minority of people running DOS programs, given that Win 95 was six years old at the time.
When you think about, if stopping people using DOS was theit intent, they did a damn poor job at it. In fact, if Microsoft HAD wanted to stop people using DOS programs, they wouldn't have included a command prompt in XP at all!
-
- Posts: 1061
- Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2003 5:29 pm
- Location: Monrovia, CA, USA
-
- Posts: 1816
- Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2003 7:21 am
- Location: NJ, USA
-
- Posts: 1816
- Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2003 7:21 am
- Location: NJ, USA
You are in the wrong place. Go off to somewhere like OUTMINDS Forum: Just For Fun or something.Seyss wrote:...i come here to have fun...