...and not ZScript?
I just made the same mistake twice in a row on this article.
Something with a clearly distinct shape and colour would be really nice.
[wiki] Some standard visual warning that something is ACS
Moderator: GZDoom Developers
-
- Posts: 9696
- Joined: Sun Jan 04, 2004 5:37 pm
- Preferred Pronouns: They/Them
- Operating System Version (Optional): Debian Bullseye
- Location: Gotham City SAR, Wyld-Lands of the Lotus People, Dominionist PetroConfederacy of Saudi Canadia
-
- Posts: 4984
- Joined: Sun Nov 14, 2010 12:59 am
Re: [wiki] Some standard visual warning that something is AC
At the bottom of the page of the function, there's a category: "ACS Actor functions". Yes, it's not a massive flashy sign, but it's good enough to tell from it that the function is ACS-related.
And by the way, I've hidden the shouty note you put there. It can be seen still, but only when editing the page.
And by the way, I've hidden the shouty note you put there. It can be seen still, but only when editing the page.
-
- Posts: 13682
- Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2004 1:31 pm
- Preferred Pronouns: She/Her
Re: [wiki] Some standard visual warning that something is AC
Indeed, all-caps and bold is hugely inappropriate for a wiki article.
A far superior alternative is a Wikipedia-style info box on the right stating in what context the function can be used, along with other helpful stats such as argument count and return type, if any can be thought of.
A far superior alternative is a Wikipedia-style info box on the right stating in what context the function can be used, along with other helpful stats such as argument count and return type, if any can be thought of.