ZDoom 2.8.0 and ACC 1.55 released

News about ZDoom, its child ports, or any closely related projects.
[ZDoom Home] [Documentation (Wiki)] [Official News] [Downloads] [Discord]
[🔎 Google This Site]

Moderator: GZDoom Developers

User avatar
Csonicgo
Posts: 1193
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 3:28 pm
Location: Leeds

Re: ZDoom 2.8.0 and ACC 1.55 released

Post by Csonicgo »

I want to personally thank Blzut3, Graf, kcat/Chris, Eevee, Quasar, and the two Edwards for helping me and others on getting this running on ARM platforms. There are still a few things to iron out (as we all know by now) but it's pretty much "there". It's been quite a ride!
User avatar
Eevee
Posts: 592
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2003 5:26 am

Re: ZDoom 2.8.0 and ACC 1.55 released

Post by Eevee »

Alrighty, I merged the extra things I found into both the wiki and my post earlier in the thread. Surely still not exhaustive, but touches on everything I'm aware of.

Also, the news post links to the "Next version" section on the wiki, rather than "2.8.0". Oops.
Monsterovich
Posts: 59
Joined: Sat Apr 12, 2014 11:10 am

Re: ZDoom 2.8.0 and ACC 1.55 released

Post by Monsterovich »

randi wrote: Linux now uses SDL2 which can produce less frame jitter with high frame rates, has some vsync support, and fullscreen is now a "desktop fullscreen" mode.
So..
- SDL_FULLSCREEN_DESKTOP is a crap that works 3x times slower than normal fullscreen. Feel the difference between zdoom 2.8 (SDL2.0) and zandronum 2.* (SDL.1.2) I have cl_capfps false and vsync is off.
- You blocked SDL_FULLSCREEN_WINDOW that's better than SDL_FULLSCREEN_DESKTOP. It works a bit faster (I have ~55fps with it), but SDL1.2 fullscreen is faster than both. Plus, I tried to use it, but SDL_FULLSCREEN_WINDOW has this bug.
- In SDL 2.0 Alt+Tab works randomly or just doesn't work at all.
- So, SDL devs just removed true fullscreen from SDL 2.0, now it's just unusable.

Conclusion: SDL 1.2 > SDL 2.0
Edward-san
Posts: 1774
Joined: Sat Oct 17, 2009 9:40 am

Re: ZDoom 2.8.0 and ACC 1.55 released

Post by Edward-san »

Monsterovich wrote: So..
- SDL_FULLSCREEN_DESKTOP is a crap that works 3x times slower than normal fullscreen. Feel the difference between zdoom 2.8 (SDL2.0) and zandronum 2.* (SDL.1.2) I have cl_capfps false and vsync is off.
- You blocked SDL_FULLSCREEN_WINDOW that's better than SDL_FULLSCREEN_DESKTOP. It works a bit faster (I have ~55fps with it), but SDL1.2 fullscreen is faster than both. Plus, I tried to use it, but SDL_FULLSCREEN_WINDOW has this bug.
- In SDL 2.0 Alt+Tab works randomly or just doesn't work at all.
- So, SDL devs just removed true fullscreen from SDL 2.0, now it's just unusable.

Conclusion: SDL 1.2 > SDL 2.0
Something like this should have been reported to the bugs forum, but it seems you knew this for a long time and never bothered to report. Why didn't you do that earlier? There could be a chance it would've been fixed before zdoom 2.8 release.
Monsterovich
Posts: 59
Joined: Sat Apr 12, 2014 11:10 am

Re: ZDoom 2.8.0 and ACC 1.55 released

Post by Monsterovich »

Edward-san wrote:Why didn't you do that earlier?
Because ZDoom has "great" quality control.
User avatar
Graf Zahl
Lead GZDoom+Raze Developer
Lead GZDoom+Raze Developer
Posts: 49184
Joined: Sat Jul 19, 2003 10:19 am
Location: Germany

Re: ZDoom 2.8.0 and ACC 1.55 released

Post by Graf Zahl »

Conclusion: Intelligent > Monsterovich

So tell us, smartass, how are we supposed to do anything about such a problem if you keep it secret?
User avatar
Csonicgo
Posts: 1193
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 3:28 pm
Location: Leeds

Re: ZDoom 2.8.0 and ACC 1.55 released

Post by Csonicgo »

Monsterovich wrote:
Edward-san wrote:Why didn't you do that earlier?
Because ZDoom has "great" quality control.
We can't fix what we don't know about.
Monsterovich
Posts: 59
Joined: Sat Apr 12, 2014 11:10 am

Re: ZDoom 2.8.0 and ACC 1.55 released

Post by Monsterovich »

Graf Zahl wrote:Conclusion: Intelligent > Monsterovich
So tell us, smartass, how are we supposed to do anything about such a problem if you keep it secret?
Oh, yes. This will probably fix this issue!!!

You should've tested it before release.
User avatar
wildweasel
Posts: 21706
Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2003 7:33 pm
Preferred Pronouns: He/Him
Operating System Version (Optional): A lot of them
Graphics Processor: Not Listed

Re: ZDoom 2.8.0 and ACC 1.55 released

Post by wildweasel »

Monsterovich wrote:
Edward-san wrote:Why didn't you do that earlier?
Because ZDoom has "great" quality control.
And I could say the same about the quality of your posting. Remember that's the entire point of the bugs forum, because the devs don't necessarily know every in and out of what the program does for everyone.

And I don't care if you have some kind of grudge. You've been warned about that once before.
User avatar
GooberMan
Posts: 1336
Joined: Fri Aug 08, 2003 12:57 am
Location: Helsinki, Finland

Re: ZDoom 2.8.0 and ACC 1.55 released

Post by GooberMan »

I've yet to see an OS handle fullscreen exclusive mode as well as Windows Vista and onwards does. Program crashes unexpectedly? Your desktop settings aren't stomped over.

I suppose this is a moot point though amirite???
User avatar
Csonicgo
Posts: 1193
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 3:28 pm
Location: Leeds

Re: ZDoom 2.8.0 and ACC 1.55 released

Post by Csonicgo »

Monsterovich wrote:
Graf Zahl wrote:Conclusion: Intelligent > Monsterovich
So tell us, smartass, how are we supposed to do anything about such a problem if you keep it secret?
Oh, yes. This will probably fix this issue!!!

You should've tested it before release.
A lot of us. All the time. Tested this. Personally, I tested the SDL2 code for months!

I never noticed any "framerate dips" or loss of performance - I saw an increase in performance. That's why we went to SDL2 in the first place! Of course there are always configurations that may not play fair, we would love to know about those so we can figure out what's wrong.
User avatar
Major Cooke
Posts: 8196
Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 3:55 pm
Preferred Pronouns: He/Him
Location: QZDoom Maintenance Team

Re: ZDoom 2.8.0 and ACC 1.55 released

Post by Major Cooke »

And now to re-rail this cargo train.

So... Anyone looking forward to Zandronum catching up? :D
User avatar
Captain Ventris
Posts: 4605
Joined: Mon Jul 31, 2006 4:25 pm
Location: San Antonio, TX

Re: ZDoom 2.8.0 and ACC 1.55 released

Post by Captain Ventris »

Because the devs are being paid and just sit around poking at ZDoom all day, right? That's why they should definitely know everything.

Monsterovich is the same type of idiot who whines incessantly about politicians and refuses to vote or take any other sort of action.

Now, I don't want to hyperbolize, but you probably deserve every bad thing that happens to you.
Monsterovich
Posts: 59
Joined: Sat Apr 12, 2014 11:10 am

Re: ZDoom 2.8.0 and ACC 1.55 released

Post by Monsterovich »

Csonicgo wrote:I never noticed any "framerate dips" or loss of performance - I saw an increase in performance.
I love these linux users who are saying: "all works for me!!!" But I don't believe in magic like this. Plus, not all of PCs have 4 core 3.2ghz processors.
User avatar
Zhs2
Posts: 1288
Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2008 3:29 pm
Graphics Processor: ATI/AMD with Vulkan/Metal Support
Location: Maryland, USA, but probably also in someone's mod somewhere

Re: ZDoom 2.8.0 and ACC 1.55 released

Post by Zhs2 »

Major Cooke wrote:And now to re-rail this cargo train.

So... Anyone looking forward to Zandronum catching up? :D
I personally am in the camp of desiring every single improvement that can be offered to ZDoom's current netplay schema. Sure, it seems really clunky to about 90% of end-users, but it was the system Doom was built in the mind of, and if you can get it to connect and run via port forwarding and all that advanced jazz, it just *works*. Little hassle actually playing, no losing all of your progress if you have a bad connection (ZDoom will actually try to keep reconnecting if possible and the only fault is the networking), the ability to save at any time and share those saves in the case something goes wrong, and sure it performs only as well as the connection between x amount of people but sometimes you just don't want that many people fragging up your multiplayer experience! For small groups of people, (G)ZDoom is my goto, and pretty much the only multiplayer Doom I've had since my college days where Skulltag HR2 survival servers were the shit (sure, you didn't win unless you were a super badass, especially once the server reached MAP15, but hey, good times.)
Monsterovich wrote:I love these linux users who are saying: "all works for me!!!" But I don't believe in magic like this. Plus, not all of PCs have 4 core 3.2ghz processors.
Hehe, I'd love to see ARM processors with those kinds of specs.

Return to “ZDoom (and related) News”