A tale of two crashes

Post by **randi** » Wed Jan 26, 2005 8:23 pm

I know. That's what the "click here" button pops up.

GeeDougg · Post by **GeeDougg** » Wed Jan 26, 2005 8:25 pm

Oh OK yeah then that's the one I'm talking about...; sorry about that.

But if I were to request a method I'd actually request an option for the user to choose which type of crash log get's displayed.... Is that doable or am I asking too much?

Post by **randi** » Wed Jan 26, 2005 8:30 pm

What do you mean? Those are all part of the same report, just different aspects of it.

GeeDougg · Post by **GeeDougg** » Wed Jan 26, 2005 8:33 pm

I mean the option to choose between the old method and the new method.... Hopefully that makes more sense.... :)

Risen · Post by **Risen** » Wed Jan 26, 2005 8:36 pm

HotWax wrote:I like whatever version helps you (Randy) out the most. In the end, you're the one who has to fix the bugs, so don't worry about what looks prettier to us. :P

This man speaks the only thing that really matters.

chronoteeth · Post by **chronoteeth** » Wed Jan 26, 2005 9:16 pm

Actually, I prefer the top one, just because it different then from that damned "Were sorry" Blah blah blah. That shit is too overused.

Post by **Chris** » Wed Jan 26, 2005 9:19 pm

Risen wrote:
HotWax wrote:I like whatever version helps you (Randy) out the most. In the end, you're the one who has to fix the bugs, so don't worry about what looks prettier to us. :P
This man speaks the only thing that really matters.

But of course, it is us that are getting the errors, so if we don't get something that works for us, Randy won't be getting the bug reports that he would with the other method.

Note that I'm not saying which one is the better one.. though I spoke my peace about my opinion.

Csonicgo · Post by **Csonicgo** » Wed Jan 26, 2005 9:44 pm

I like the new one, just replying to say that.

Post by **Enjay** » Thu Jan 27, 2005 2:58 am

HotWax wrote:I like whatever version helps you (Randy) out the most. In the end, you're the one who has to fix the bugs, so don't worry about what looks prettier to us.

Absolutely. And the most recent version you (Randy) posted looks good to me.

Post by **Enjay** » Thu Jan 27, 2005 3:02 am

skadoomer wrote:So what will become of the bugs fourm then if the information can just be transported to randy?

There are plenty more bugs than just crashes, so people wopuld still want to report them. The option to report bugs that cause a crash would still exist but we probably wouldn't need to post the crash report anymore (because Randy would already have it). We could, however, still talk about causes and symptoms.

arcticwolf · Post by **arcticwolf** » Thu Jan 27, 2005 3:52 am

The new one looks nice enough, but I'm wondering - how exactly will reports be submitted? I sure hope you won't rely on a working installation of outlook or something like that to send email reports... :)

QBasicer · Post by **QBasicer** » Thu Jan 27, 2005 8:15 am

I think that top banner has to be changed. Can't it be a graphic or something instead?

Post by **TheDarkArchon** » Thu Jan 27, 2005 8:24 am

I like that last one.

ducon · Post by **ducon** » Thu Jan 27, 2005 9:44 am

And what will happen for Linux users? ZDoom wont crash here?

Post by **Enjay** » Thu Jan 27, 2005 10:02 am

There is no official Linux build for the newer versions ATM as far as I know. So, for the moment, that's not an issue.