In which I imagined hunting for men

Athel · Post by **Athel** » Wed Apr 22, 2015 8:01 pm

OK, let's forget what gender Randi is. (S)He is god. He IS no gender!

Now, the most important question: where the hell is our DoomScript?!

Big C · Post by **Big C** » Wed Apr 22, 2015 9:15 pm

Doom Scriptem Forever.

Blox · Post by **Blox** » Thu Apr 23, 2015 12:01 am

fellowzdoomer wrote:OK, let's forget what gender Randi is. (S)He is god. He IS no gender!

randi wrote:I am a human, not an it.

you're gonna need a better 'hey guys this discussion is pointless let's just stop it' one-liner than that
:^)

DBThanatos · Post by **DBThanatos** » Thu Apr 23, 2015 3:50 am

randi wrote:
DBThanatos wrote:I'll continue using "him" as I always have. That's the default I use for everybody.
What if I don't like that either?

Considering you didnt say "I dont like that", I'll take it that you're saying that it's a possibility, not a certainty, therefore, by not directly admitting you dont like it, I dont find myself compelled to not use it. AKA, I'll continue using "him" until you say you'd rather by called something different.

I do realize you'll never directly admit anything. That's the fun of the game you're playing

scalliano · Post by **scalliano** » Thu Apr 23, 2015 5:30 pm

From now on I shall refer to randi using the terms, "xe", "xir", and "xirself".

Post by **Blzut3** » Fri Apr 24, 2015 12:59 am

Blox wrote:you're gonna need a better 'hey guys this discussion is pointless let's just stop it' one-liner than that
:^)

If an AI were to exist that could pass the turing test, would they not say they are human?

Onar4241 · Post by **Onar4241** » Sat Apr 25, 2015 1:54 am

I think this got WAAAAY too far.

Tapwave · Post by **Tapwave** » Sat Apr 25, 2015 2:42 am

Onar4241 wrote:I think this got WAAAAY too far.

The great debates about Randi's randyness have no limit here I'm afraid.

Big C · Post by **Big C** » Sat Apr 25, 2015 3:33 am

Tapwave wrote:
Onar4241 wrote:I think this got WAAAAY too far.
The great debates about Randi's randyness have no limit here I'm afraid.

Post by **Major Cooke** » Sat Apr 25, 2015 5:49 pm

randi wrote:Is it bad if it amuses me to no end every time people start debating what my gender is? How many years has this been going on for now?

Some of us have seen you post your picture.

Arctangent · Post by **Arctangent** » Sat Apr 25, 2015 5:52 pm

Major Cooke wrote:
randi wrote:Is it bad if it amuses me to no end every time people start debating what my gender is? How many years has this been going on for now?
Some of us have seen you post your picture.

To be fair, physical sex is completely irrelevant to gender.

raymoohawk · Post by **raymoohawk** » Sat Apr 25, 2015 6:07 pm

i agree with arctangent

Post by **randi** » Sat Apr 25, 2015 9:37 pm

Major Cooke wrote:Some of us have seen you post your picture.

Those are outdated. I have a new haircut and hair color now.

Post by **Caligari87** » Sat Apr 25, 2015 10:05 pm

Weeeeeelllll... I don't think the selfie thread has *quite* fallen off the board yet... *nudge nudge*

Post by **Coraline** » Sat Apr 25, 2015 11:24 pm

randi wrote:
Major Cooke wrote:Some of us have seen you post your picture.
Those are outdated. I have a new haircut and hair color now.

It's true

her bangs are to die for! <3

ZDoom

In which I imagined hunting for men

Re: In which I imagined hunting for men

Re: In which I imagined hunting for men

Re: In which I imagined hunting for men

Re: In which I imagined hunting for men

Re: In which I imagined hunting for men

Re: In which I imagined hunting for men

Re: In which I imagined hunting for men

Re: In which I imagined hunting for men

Re: In which I imagined hunting for men

Re: In which I imagined hunting for men

Re: In which I imagined hunting for men

Re: In which I imagined hunting for men

Re: In which I imagined hunting for men

Re: In which I imagined hunting for men

Re: In which I imagined hunting for men