Sorry for the bumpage but I was just playing around with this on a map that uses low-friction and I found that it has an interesting side effect. Icy areas that were meant to be very slippery actually became less slippery than regular floors.
I've attached a map for easy comparison. Load the attached into GZDoom without nashmove and see how slippery the central area with the SHAWN2 floor is then try again with nashmove loaded.
I also tested it with "sludgy" friction floors and it seemed to make things a bit more sludgy. It certainly didn't make them any less so anyway.
Less Slippery Doom Movement (May 2018 ZScript rewrite)
Forum rules
The Projects forums are only for projects. If you are asking questions about a project, either find that project's thread, or start a thread in the General section instead.
Got a cool project idea but nothing else? Put it in the project ideas thread instead!
Projects for any Doom-based engine (especially 3DGE) are perfectly acceptable here too.
Please read the full rules for more details.
The Projects forums are only for projects. If you are asking questions about a project, either find that project's thread, or start a thread in the General section instead.
Got a cool project idea but nothing else? Put it in the project ideas thread instead!
Projects for any Doom-based engine (especially 3DGE) are perfectly acceptable here too.
Please read the full rules for more details.
-
Enjay
-
- Posts: 26441
- Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2003 4:58 pm
- Location: Scotland
-
ramon.dexter
- Posts: 1339
- Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2015 12:50 pm
- Graphics Processor: nVidia with Vulkan support
- Location: Kozolupy, Bohemia
Re: Less Slippery Doom Movement (May 2018 ZScript rewrite)
Yup, the same happens in Hexen map seven portals - the icy parts are less slippery than normal surface with this mod.Enjay wrote:Sorry for the bumpage but I was just playing around with this on a map that uses low-friction and I found that it has an interesting side effect. Icy areas that were meant to be very slippery actually became less slippery than regular floors.
I've attached a map for easy comparison. Load the attached into GZDoom without nashmove and see how slippery the central area with the SHAWN2 floor is then try again with nashmove loaded.
I also tested it with "sludgy" friction floors and it seemed to make things a bit more sludgy. It certainly didn't make them any less so anyway.
-
Yeetee
- Posts: 16
- Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2020 12:34 pm
Re: Less Slippery Doom Movement (May 2018 ZScript rewrite)
Found this doesn't work with immerse. 
(https://github.com/JRHard771/Immerse/releases)
EDIT: what happens is that you still move with strafe lean held
(https://github.com/JRHard771/Immerse/releases)
EDIT: what happens is that you still move with strafe lean held
-
Doomza
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2022 7:48 am
Re: Less Slippery Doom Movement (May 2018 ZScript rewrite)
This is easily one of my favorite mods because I have no fond memories of doom guy ice-skating through levels, and never felt quite "right" to me. However I've started to encounter issues with total conversions where new and special types of movement is required. Are there any hints or tips how to correct this via SLADE or something?
-
Rowsol
- Posts: 911
- Joined: Wed Mar 06, 2013 5:31 am
Re: Less Slippery Doom Movement (May 2018 ZScript rewrite)
What are you on about? If a new type of movement is required it will be included in said mod. In that case just don't load this.
-
Nash
-
- Posts: 17340
- Joined: Mon Oct 27, 2003 12:07 am
- Location: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Re: Less Slippery Doom Movement (May 2018 ZScript rewrite)
Yeah, this code resource* is not meant to be stacked with other mods that also alter movement.
* I am considering pushing a final update to this that changes its status from "let's throw this into my load order" into "resource for custom TC/standalone authors". The more I think abuot it, it never was meant to be a plug-and-play thing. Some assembly will be needed.
* I am considering pushing a final update to this that changes its status from "let's throw this into my load order" into "resource for custom TC/standalone authors". The more I think abuot it, it never was meant to be a plug-and-play thing. Some assembly will be needed.