Well, personally, I compile my own so the only point of SVN builds like RazTK's is that it allows to quickly test many old revisions when looking for which revision introduced a bug or behavior change. (I can use TortoiseSVN to update to wanted old revision n, then compile it, and test it, but it takes quite some time, so when there are many revisions to test it's far too much of a bother.) So, so long as you continue to keep old compiled versions around, what you do is useful. Even if not useful often because it's not every day I'm tracking the origin of a bug.Nash wrote:Important update!
Updates will be a bit slower because I've recently assembled a new computer, and it's my first time using Vista, so I'll need some time to get used to the OS, re-install my old setup and stuff.
But more importantly, I have put up an important poll.
Originally, my intentions were to take over where RazTK left off. Back then, RazTK was the only source of SVN executables, but he eventually stopped updating and ZDoom users were stuck with a very old revision for a very long time and I felt that I should step up and take over his role.
It has come to my attention that SoulPriestess has setup an SVN archive over at DRDTeam. With two people doing essentially the same thing, I begin to wonder if I should even bother doing what I do or not.
I don't see much point in me taking the effort to keep updating and uploading newer versions if someone else is also doing it (and may be doing a better/more consistant job at it).
Opinions please.
Edit: Quoting Nash's post since this is a new page.