You seem to have figured it out already.TheOxingey wrote:i dont know how to post posts, please help me![]()
![]()

You seem to have figured it out already.TheOxingey wrote:i dont know how to post posts, please help me![]()
![]()
So I cannot post with my opinions about mod i like because no-one reply to it for more than month?Don't "bump," "revive," or "necro" old topics. The rule of thumb is about 30 days, or 1 month. Uselessly bumping old topics will get you yelled at, especially if it's a very old Projects thread. If you're going to post in an old thread, you should have a very good reason for doing so, for example asking questions about how an old mod works. We do have a couple of useful threads to stop pointless bumping; ask here if a download link is broken, or read this thread if a mod doesn't seem to run correctly. If your bump consists solely of "So, any updates?", there will be hell to pay.
I wish to expand on this with a handy "What Is A Not-Useless Bump?" guide.Rachael wrote:As long as the post is useful in some way, i.e. asks important questions that are actually helpful for other folks, or gives constructive (and well-worded) feedback, you're fine.
Is preferable to a post like this:Hey, thanks for making Super This Is Totally A Mod 3.0, it really improves my Dooming experience and I especially like how you made the Shotguns fire small packets of potato chips that explode into shaving cream, I felt that was a really nice touch.
hey this is p. cool
I mean it's not like anybody ever gets warned for a Useless Bump.Lagi wrote:thanks,
oh boy, i feel pressure now
There's nothing else by you in the moderator queue besides this post, and I can't find any disapproved posts on the logs that say they were by you.Messiah wrote:I posted a thread yesterday that stated it needed moderator approval.
It is still not visible.
- If you need help with a project, ask in open chat. Do not pester developers for help. Knowledge benefits all, and the developers tend to be pretty busy anyway. There may be valid reasons to contact a dev privately, but if it really is needed please do this as rarely as possible.
I am relatively foggy on the details past a certain point, but back in the day, some update for Brutal had stated that it would be including new realistic gore sprites "from photos" - the implication being they were photos of actual corpses, from crime scenes or autopsies or whatever. The community largely decided that was gross and unnecessary and a little disturbing, so the author decided not to include it in the mod after all, though there was certainly word afterwards that there was a patch somewhere to reinstate it.The BMFG wrote:brutal doom real gore patch? oh god is that actually a thing?. does it really use real gore? (gore from photographs and all)
Thanks for clarifying wildweasel. hope you have a good daywildweasel wrote:I am relatively foggy on the details past a certain point, but back in the day, some update for Brutal had stated that it would be including new realistic gore sprites "from photos" - the implication being they were photos of actual corpses, from crime scenes or autopsies or whatever. The community largely decided that was gross and unnecessary and a little disturbing, so the author decided not to include it in the mod after all, though there was certainly word afterwards that there was a patch somewhere to reinstate it.The BMFG wrote:brutal doom real gore patch? oh god is that actually a thing?. does it really use real gore? (gore from photographs and all)
For obvious reasons, we'd prefer that there be no links to that patch. Because... ewww.