With AMD releasing FSR 2.2, I'm wondering if it'd be possible to implement into GZDoom?
https://github.com/GPUOpen-Effects/FidelityFX-FSR2
If anyone's interested in looking at it. I'm not going to call this a full feature request, as I'm not entirely sure there would be a benefit to VRAM usage. In my mind, there should be, but I don't know enough to really make that claim.
Check it out, though. At the very least it's an interesting repo to browse.
Adding AMD FSR 2.2?
Moderator: GZDoom Developers
-
- Posts: 123
- Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2019 10:22 am
- Preferred Pronouns: He/Him
- Operating System Version (Optional): Windows 11 Professional X64
- Graphics Processor: nVidia with Vulkan support
-
- Lead GZDoom+Raze Developer
- Posts: 49188
- Joined: Sat Jul 19, 2003 10:19 am
- Location: Germany
Re: Adding AMD FSR 2.2?
This is way out of scope for a Doom port.
-
- Posts: 310
- Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2018 8:14 am
Re: Adding AMD FSR 2.2?
While this is cool tech, I have a feeling it would struggle with our use cases as it relies on coherency between frames, for example a monster making a 45 degree turn is probably too much for it.
-
- Posts: 123
- Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2019 10:22 am
- Preferred Pronouns: He/Him
- Operating System Version (Optional): Windows 11 Professional X64
- Graphics Processor: nVidia with Vulkan support
Re: Adding AMD FSR 2.2?
If it was easy to implement, I'd say give it a try and find out, but it looks like implementing this into GZDoom wouldn't be as straightforward as it is for a modern engine. I just figured I'd bring it to your attention.
-
- Posts: 13834
- Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2004 1:31 pm
- Preferred Pronouns: She/Her
Re: Adding AMD FSR 2.2?
It's not that easy to implement because GZDoom does not save data between frames which is important for an implementation like this. Plus it also needs a lot of other data in order to function (such as vertex shader info) which is not readily available.