Nevander wrote:I do however use
Doom Expanded instead. It accomplishes the same thing as BD, without being overly ridiculous and still keeps the classic Doom feel while being fresh. I tried Beautiful Doom but I didn't like it too much.
I do the same with my
RDND mod, atop not really being into Beautiful Doom as well.
fellowzdoomer wrote:demo_the_man wrote:Yeah i was wondering what happent to mark, the EA of doom. Hes gone silent on everything, but then again theres this new gustavo guy that was hiving around lately.
He was banned off of almost all doom related forums due to his attitude, the fact that he told people to kill themselves and even said he's "worse than Hitler". The worst part? He says these are jokes.
Jokes.
Yea, I'm not surprised he's banned from here and Zandronum forums but not Doomworld (yet). He probably knows the staff have little tolerance for stupid bullshit antics he pulled elsewhere.
scalliano wrote:I look at some of the more elaborate mods I've played over the years - UTnT, DE, WF, LoS, BTSX, UAC Ultra, etc and I lament the fact that .WADs like those didn't get the coverage BD did, when they are all much more indicative of where the scene is at (I actually rate UTnT's final boss battle as one of my all-time favourites in terms of games in general, not just Doom). Where's their spot in PC Gamer?
It's like those idiots on Kotaku only like the mods that will stir up controversy among the gaming community.