[WIP][NSFW?] Attack of the Anatomically Correct Charmanders!

Projects that have specifically been abandoned or considered "dead" get moved here, so people will quit bumping them. If your project has wound up here and it should not be, contact a moderator to have it moved back to the land of the living.
User avatar
Kilkakon
Posts: 314
Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2004 11:53 pm
Location: Western Australia
Contact:

Re: [WIP][NSFW?] Attack of the Anatomically Correct Charmanders!

Post by Kilkakon »

To be honest, I agree. There's enough of that stuff outside of the xrated directory already (which makes this look tame in comparison). So I'm going to have to trust the Zdoom community with that. Remember folks: Corrupt the charmanders and Davidos is go and throw up all over you. :puke:

As for Lysander, well it's a joke. :P If it all made sense it wouldn't really be a joke anymore. And I think that there's little point doing a joke badly. There's enough jokewads out there that make one puke over their quality. Besides, some of the most popular moods are ones that are a little out there.

I can almost hear people say "A LITTLE?!?!" XD
User avatar
ShadesMaster
Posts: 658
Joined: Thu Jun 12, 2008 2:05 am

Re: [WIP][NSFW?] Attack of the Anatomically Correct Charmanders!

Post by ShadesMaster »

Easier solution - Rename the mod:

Attack of the Anatomically ERECT Charmanders
User avatar
Kilkakon
Posts: 314
Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2004 11:53 pm
Location: Western Australia
Contact:

Re: [WIP][NSFW?] Attack of the Anatomically Correct Charmanders!

Post by Kilkakon »

Somehow I don't know how that would help. :) And there's not a single erection in the whole game anyway.
User avatar
Dancso
Posts: 1906
Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 10:39 am
Location: at home.. Status: lazy like hell

Re: [WIP][NSFW?] Attack of the Anatomically Correct Charmanders!

Post by Dancso »

Kilkakon wrote:there's not a single erection in the whole game anyway.
Except for the player possibly, if he has a pokémon/charmander fetish. :twisted:
User avatar
Davidos
Posts: 329
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2005 2:52 am

Re: [WIP][NSFW?] Attack of the Anatomically Correct Charmanders!

Post by Davidos »

=.= Oh god I can see a sex minigame already.


GET IT OUT OF MY HEAD!


So uh, OP, do you have a pokemon fetish? XD
User avatar
Kilkakon
Posts: 314
Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2004 11:53 pm
Location: Western Australia
Contact:

Re: [WIP][NSFW?] Attack of the Anatomically Correct Charmanders!

Post by Kilkakon »

No fetishes here. :P

As for a sex minigame, well I'm not doing it, and really anybody who would make that is a little sad. Sex is something that's meant to be enjoyed in between two married people, not as an arcade video game. ():)

Back onto topic if we can: If anybody's wanting to make anything, please make some maps instead. :D
User avatar
Davidos
Posts: 329
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2005 2:52 am

Re: [WIP][NSFW?] Attack of the Anatomically Correct Charmanders!

Post by Davidos »

Truthfully I'd have to convert to (anti-)furrydom to actually ever play/make anything for this wad.

So nah thanks I'll skip this one.
User avatar
Kilkakon
Posts: 314
Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2004 11:53 pm
Location: Western Australia
Contact:

Re: [WIP][NSFW?] Attack of the Anatomically Correct Charmanders!

Post by Kilkakon »

You don't have to be a furry to shoot one. ;)
User avatar
chronoteeth
Posts: 2664
Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2004 1:29 pm
Preferred Pronouns: It/Its

Re: [WIP][NSFW?] Attack of the Anatomically Correct Charmanders!

Post by chronoteeth »

Its a shame, from the old wads in progress thread this wad looked so epic. Turns out to be a pokemon wad with dicks and another one of those "kid thing done maturely to try and cater to an adult audience" thingy. Come on dude this is just silly, its like that one tails wad where he's a commando with guns. :[
User avatar
Davidos
Posts: 329
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2005 2:52 am

Re: [WIP][NSFW?] Attack of the Anatomically Correct Charmanders!

Post by Davidos »

More offtopicness:
chronoteeth wrote:Its like that one tails wad where he's a commando with guns. :[
Oooh.... oohooohoooh..


That's like a kick in the jaw there for the author of the other wad, who's probably actively reading these posts too.

It's actually pretty good compared to most wads and, unlike most of those things did have some time put into it, it's still being worked on I think.
User avatar
Janitor
Posts: 72
Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 11:33 am
Location: Not in Kansas anymore

Re: [WIP][NSFW?] Attack of the Anatomically Correct Charmanders!

Post by Janitor »

What the ... what is this, I dont even....
User avatar
Unknown_Assassin
Posts: 2468
Joined: Wed Apr 12, 2006 5:17 pm
Location: Where dead carcasses lie
Contact:

Re: [WIP][NSFW?] Attack of the Anatomically Correct Charmanders!

Post by Unknown_Assassin »

This project is really strange, but I have no problem with killing Pokemon...especially with their dicks hanging out.
User avatar
Project Shadowcat
Posts: 9369
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2005 8:33 pm
Preferred Pronouns: They/Them
Operating System Version (Optional): Windows 11
Graphics Processor: nVidia with Vulkan support
Location: Blacksburg, SC USA
Contact:

Re: [WIP][NSFW?] Attack of the Anatomically Correct Charmanders!

Post by Project Shadowcat »

Davidos wrote:That's like a kick in the jaw there for the author of the other wad, who's probably actively reading these posts too.
That's why I wear a chinstrap.
User avatar
Major Cooke
Posts: 8209
Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 3:55 pm
Preferred Pronouns: He/Him
Operating System Version (Optional): Windows 10
Graphics Processor: nVidia with Vulkan support
Location: GZBoomer Town
Contact:

Re: [WIP][NSFW?] Attack of the Anatomically Correct Charmanders!

Post by Major Cooke »

...I don't even want to know... From seeing all of the posts in this thread... Eh... *backs out slowly*

Though I must say I think it kinda represents trying to repel being "raped", so to say... No, I haven't tried it.
User avatar
Kilkakon
Posts: 314
Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2004 11:53 pm
Location: Western Australia
Contact:

Re: [WIP][NSFW?] Attack of the Anatomically Correct Charmanders!

Post by Kilkakon »

I suppose the good thing about low expectations is that it's easy to suprass them. The proof is in the playing, folks. :) Remember that it's not meant to be taken too seriously anyways.

And Major Cooke: I have no idea what you just said. :P Please explain.
Locked

Return to “Abandoned/Dead Projects”