Get a new laptop or slowly build a entry desktop PC, bud. God forbid, try one of those PCI-E-USB adapters with a cheap video card (Arc A310, brand new). Sure, you won't get 60FPS Ultra graphics but it's doable. iGPUs are always previous, sometimes previous-previous generations older than what's currently supported at the time of release. If anything, they're meant to give your computer some sort of graphical display with some capability of running software and looking at YouTube videos. Gaming for these iGPUs are always last in the list. There's a reason why AMD doesn't slap iGPUs onto their mainstream CPUs - and when they do, they let you know by adding the "G" affix to their lineup; Ryzen 5 4650G, for an example... It's because they know iGPUs are crap for gaming, and AMD is more centered towards the PC enthusiasts on the cheap. Intel on the other hand; I mean, I'm looking at the semi-latest iGPUs performance for their $409 CPU, the Core i5 13600k, at time of release. Borderlands 3 runs at 45.5 FPS on 360p on Very Low settings. Let that settle in. That's 360p. 640x360 for 16:9. That's DOS-era resolutions right there.yum13241 wrote: Thu Aug 29, 2024 1:31 pm Cuz' it's the main potato factor. iGPU's like mine are ONLY found on crappy CPU's/SoC's like mine.
Banging your head at bricks won't solve the problem.
That's... What, two generations ago (again, time of release) entry level $50 GPU that's... only really capable of displaying a DWM and playing YouTube videos and maybe a Cookie Clicker / Bejeweled 3?
So to borrow what you said:
Banging your head at bricks won't solve the problem.
