FANG2 wrote:If that's the same stones.wad I think it is, perhaps you should do some editing
http://doomwiki.org/wiki/STONES.WAD
This STONES? If so, feedback on what to fix is appreciated.
FANG2 wrote:If that's the same stones.wad I think it is, perhaps you should do some editing
It should be obvious if you play it, the HOMs and inescapapble nukage pit are pretty bad. Everything else it ok.BlueFireZ88 wrote:FANG2 wrote:If that's the same stones.wad I think it is, perhaps you should do some editing
http://doomwiki.org/wiki/STONES.WAD
This STONES? If so, feedback on what to fix is appreciated.
Here, try it now.FANG2 wrote:It should be obvious if you play it, the HOMs and inescapapble nukage pit are pretty bad. Everything else it ok.BlueFireZ88 wrote:FANG2 wrote:If that's the same stones.wad I think it is, perhaps you should do some editing
http://doomwiki.org/wiki/STONES.WAD
This STONES? If so, feedback on what to fix is appreciated.
I am and I STILL don't see the point. What the hell kind of project is this, just compiling maps?BlueFireZ88 wrote:Seriously, don't you people read the previous posts before posting yourselves?
I'm sorry if I haven't specified what exactly this project is attempting to accomplish.Project Dark Fox wrote:I am and I STILL don't see the point. What the hell kind of project is this, just compiling maps?BlueFireZ88 wrote:Seriously, don't you people read the previous posts before posting yourselves?
No problem, dude. I just asking it.BlueFireZ88 wrote:No offense, but read the first post and I quote from one of my earlier post
It's ok, don't worry about it. By the way, those levels you suggested were added to the list. Not bad choices.daimon wrote:No problem, dude. I just asking it.BlueFireZ88 wrote:No offense, but read the first post and I quote from one of my earlier post
and yes, i forgot to read well the first post.
You already did before, you're just repeating yourself. I think you're trying to get yourself an unwarranted 15 minutes of fame just compiling together levels that you didn't bother editing for sake of consistency or anything of the sort.BlueFireZ88 wrote:I'm sorry if I haven't specified what exactly this project is attempting to accomplish.
So let me try to explain this as best I can.
Say what you'd like, I'm not stopping this. I can't tell you to like it or not, it's not my call. If you know what to expect from a mega wad, then you already know what your getting into. If you like it, cool, if you don't, oh well, tell me what was wrong with it (in a professional critique manner of course, not just "IT SUCKS"). I'd at least hope for something decent to come out of all this.Project Dark Fox wrote: I think you should just stop altogether; this probably won't go well wherever you decide to upload this ... "compilation" of the "best", because a mixed bag of even good WADs is still a mixed bag.
Hardly the "Best of the best", then, are they?!BlueFireZ88 wrote:I've noticed that some of these wads suffer from certain issues in gameplay and level structure.