ZDoom 2.0.98 Bugfixing bugfix release

Grubber · Post by **Grubber** » Sat Nov 05, 2005 1:03 am

@Hirogen2: 2.0.96x =/= GZDoom

Post by **Graf Zahl** » Sat Nov 05, 2005 2:36 am

No, GZDoom is at 2.0.98x by now!

MartinHowe · Post by **MartinHowe** » Sat Nov 05, 2005 5:16 am

Speaking with my "confused end-user" hat on, why do GZDoom and "GrubberSoftDoom" continue to exist separately? Is there anything, not OpenGL-related, that one has and the other hasn't? If not, is there any way that you two could arrange to at least keep your versions in-step regarding non OpenGL-related extensions [to ZDoom]? For end-users, GZDoom would ideally be a true superset of "GrubberSoftDoom", as it would make choice of port a lot easier.

Sparky · Post by **Sparky** » Sat Nov 05, 2005 7:00 am

i dont think grubbers supports legacy wads

or crouching
does it?

Post by **Bio Hazard** » Sat Nov 05, 2005 1:42 pm

I need to add an easy port select to ZDL... :S

Shadelight · Post by **Shadelight** » Sat Nov 05, 2005 2:34 pm

hurry up and finish the next ZDL then dammit

Grubber · Post by **Grubber** » Sun Nov 06, 2005 4:24 am

Well, I wanted to ask before...

@Graf: Will you help me maintaining next unofficial release? Or are you now interested only in GZDoom? I'm asking because I haven't got time to do it myself but I want to release some of the features I made in last 2 months.

Post by **Graf Zahl** » Sun Nov 06, 2005 4:57 am

I really don't have the time to maintain two projects. Is there really any need to do this separately? GZDoom still has the complete software renderer and the only issue is that it has to create GL nodes - even when running in software mode.
If that is a concern I can add a 'locked' software mode that doesn't recreate the nodes but also doesn't allow switching to GL mode when inside a level.

You can send me your code and I'll integrate it into GZDoom.

Shadelight · Post by **Shadelight** » Sun Nov 06, 2005 12:55 pm

omg custom classes in GZDoom

Deathsong12 · Post by **Deathsong12** » Sun Nov 06, 2005 1:37 pm

I can't wait for that. Anybody want to be co-lead on the "Player Class Resource Wad?"

Shadelight · Post by **Shadelight** » Sun Nov 06, 2005 3:54 pm

sure! I'd make an Imp class.
OMG Minotaur class!!

Belial · Post by **Belial** » Sun Nov 06, 2005 8:41 pm

Hmm. Mong, Moron and n00b classes could be useful for zdforums.wad.

Yeah, Flamer would be useful too.

Deathsong12 · Post by **Deathsong12** » Sun Nov 06, 2005 8:54 pm

What's the big difference between the three? They seem to get used for the same people a lot.

HobbsTiger1 · Post by **HobbsTiger1** » Sun Nov 06, 2005 8:54 pm

Belial wrote:Yeah, Flamer would be useful too.

I could be an archvile variant

Deathsong12 · Post by **Deathsong12** » Sun Nov 06, 2005 8:58 pm

That's what I was planning to have you be in my secrect level in Demonic Lair. The basic idea is that KoF had released his map, and it's up to you to stop the other forum goers from providing so much...ahem...critisisim that he commits sucide. Hobbs is the final boss of this little "Defend KoF" thing, with Jalla being the midboss. You should see the sprites and sounds I'm using for KoF. They're roffletastic.