I said reverse SLADE. SLADE is a resource editing tool with embedded map editor, while with your proposal you are suggesting that a map editor should get an embedded resource editing tool in it.AntonZab wrote:slade and gzdoom different things
GZDoom Builder 2.3
Re: GZDoom Builder 2.3
Re: GZDoom Builder 2.3
You right. Yes. Reverse SLADE. It will be much better than Slade. And. GZDoom not only map editor. As he edits all scripts. Why not resources?
Re: GZDoom Builder 2.3
How do you know? If you don't like something about SLADE you should post your concerns in its thread. And why spend time to replace a perfectly fine tool that's still being developed when this time could go to new map editing features?AntonZab wrote:It will be much better than Slade.
Re: GZDoom Builder 2.3
I do not want to replace it. I want to upgrade it. And I never used SladeHow do you know? If you don't like something about SLADE you should post your concerns in its thread. And why spend time to replace a perfectly fine tool that's still being developed when this time could go to new map editing features?
Re: GZDoom Builder 2.3
Soooo, if you've never used Slade, how do you know that a lump editor in GZDB that doesn't even exist will be better?
Re: GZDoom Builder 2.3
I think so. I just wish that it was all in one. And it would be GZDoom Builder
Re: GZDoom Builder 2.3
Also. Punctuation. I too can. Place them. Anywhere. Without rhyme. Or. Reason.
Re: GZDoom Builder 2.3
My work is to offer. And then think of what you want. And I'm sorry for my bad english
Re: GZDoom Builder 2.3
It would be great if GZDoom Builder became kinda like DeePSea, having a generic lump editor besides the map editor, because right now it's uncertain what will happen if I have the same wad open in parallel in SLADE and GZDoom Builder and save from both sides. CodeImp held by the opinion that Doom Builder should NEVER be more than a map editor, but I think that can be softened up.ZZYZX wrote:I said reverse SLADE. SLADE is a resource editing tool with embedded map editor, while with your proposal you are suggesting that a map editor should get an embedded resource editing tool in it.AntonZab wrote:slade and gzdoom different things
Re: GZDoom Builder 2.3
SLADE has had an "open in Doom Builder" feature for years now.
Re: GZDoom Builder 2.3
That can surely be softened up by pull requests, which implement said functionality.printz wrote:I think that can be softened up.
- Siberian Tiger
- Posts: 476
- Joined: Fri Jun 12, 2009 11:23 pm
- Preferred Pronouns: He/Him
- Operating System Version (Optional): Windows 10 Pro. 22H2
- Graphics Processor: nVidia (Modern GZDoom)
- Location: United States
- Contact:
Re: GZDoom Builder 2.3
Nice to see that this editor is still actively being developed and even switched over to github! Thank you for your continued support by making (GZ)Doom mapping easier for everyone
Re: GZDoom Builder 2.3
And you say it's safe? Saving the map in (GZ)Doom Builder will autoupdate the wad in SLADE? Does SLADE in general listen for outside wad updates?Gez wrote:SLADE has had an "open in Doom Builder" feature for years now.
Re: GZDoom Builder 2.3
SLADE listens to outside wad updates if you tell it to, and the way to tell it to is to use "open in Doom Builder".
- Da Spadger
- Posts: 438
- Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2006 10:12 am
Re: GZDoom Builder 2.3
Ah, there we go. Didn't see the option for it at first. Thanks.Xabis wrote:This is already in GZDB for AmbientSound and AmbientSoundNoGravity.Da Spadger wrote:What if the AmbientSound actor showed how far away it could be heard from?