Is there a downside to useing launchers?

Discuss anything ZDoom-related that doesn't fall into one of the other categories.
User avatar
Xim
Posts: 2094
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 2:46 pm
Location: somewhere with trees

Is there a downside to useing launchers?

Post by Xim »

Personally, I use a launcher but a lot of people don't seem to use launchers and just type in the INI files (or whatever it is they do). Is this because there is a downside to using launchers? Or just simply because they don't wanna use one?
User avatar
Ceeb
Posts: 5125
Joined: Wed Jun 11, 2008 4:07 pm
Location: Castle Wut

Re: Is there a downside to useing launchers?

Post by Ceeb »

Personal preference. I use ZDL, quick and painless. I've never been a command-line kinda guy.
User avatar
Remmirath
Posts: 2562
Joined: Sun Dec 23, 2007 3:53 am
Graphics Processor: nVidia with Vulkan support
Location: My house
Contact:

Re: Is there a downside to useing launchers?

Post by Remmirath »

I'm a "Drag'n Drop" guy. :P
User avatar
Xaser
 
 
Posts: 10774
Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2003 12:15 pm
Contact:

Re: Is there a downside to useing launchers?

Post by Xaser »

If you've got a good launcher, like ZDL, I see no problem at all with ever using one. But there's a few die-hards like myself who refuse to use anything but command line. That's the only reason why, I think. ;)
User avatar
DoomDude2009
Posts: 51
Joined: Mon May 11, 2009 6:02 pm
Location: Mars City HQ

Re: Is there a downside to useing launchers?

Post by DoomDude2009 »

Speaking of zdl, I've been trying to figure out a way to load any IWAD without it loading the files present in the External Files. Let's say I want to play Evilution but if I have Memento Mori in the External Files it automatically loads it too, resulting in some nastly mixture of both wads. Is there any way to prevent this, or do I have to remove the E. Files?
User avatar
Graf Zahl
Lead GZDoom+Raze Developer
Lead GZDoom+Raze Developer
Posts: 49234
Joined: Sat Jul 19, 2003 10:19 am
Location: Germany

Re: Is there a downside to useing launchers?

Post by Graf Zahl »

I don't use launchers. I have never seen one that lets me configure it like I want. But launchers are just the result of Windows's poor command line support anyway so by using tools that offer a command line on their GUI it's not an issue for me.
User avatar
Nash
 
 
Posts: 17501
Joined: Mon Oct 27, 2003 12:07 am
Location: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Contact:

Re: Is there a downside to useing launchers?

Post by Nash »

If you use launchers, you'll be called a n00b!!1

j/k

BTW cmdopen is awesome. Works perfectly in Vista x64.
User avatar
Enjay
 
 
Posts: 27115
Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2003 4:58 pm
Location: Scotland
Contact:

Re: Is there a downside to useing launchers?

Post by Enjay »

I use ZDL. I was a real command-line diehard and used to run almost everything from the command line. However, as Windows was changed to have increasingly complicated directory names, and to make virtual directories and obfuscate exactly where the files really were by having directories rename themselves on the fly I got fed up having to try and remember or type in such nonsense and moved to ZDL. ZDL is pretty darned good IMO. It's nice and simple (I really don't like complicated Doom launchers at all - there's simply no need and they make a relatively easy task far more complicated than it needs to be) and gives easy access to the command line options in a pretty traditional way should additional options be required.
Gez
 
 
Posts: 17946
Joined: Fri Jul 06, 2007 3:22 pm

Re: Is there a downside to useing launchers?

Post by Gez »

Nash wrote:BTW cmdopen is awesome. Works perfectly in Vista x64.
It's also pretty redundant if you have Vista: if you hold shift when you rightclick, you get the same thing. Yes, including the "no need to navigate up a level" thing. Only stuff it lacks out-of-the-box is a separate option for "open elevated command line window here".

On-topic: I use right-click -> Open With or right-click -> Send To.
User avatar
DoomRater
Posts: 8270
Joined: Wed Jul 28, 2004 8:21 am
Preferred Pronouns: He/Him
Location: WATR HQ
Contact:

Re: Is there a downside to useing launchers?

Post by DoomRater »

I still use my old Telefrag MapSpawn because I have quick access to my WAD list plus a command line textbox so it's easy to reconfigure things the way I need. Too bad I tried to combine the IWAD and Game engine together into a project and as a result nobody wants to use it.
User avatar
Coon
Posts: 147
Joined: Mon Jul 14, 2008 7:42 am

Re: Is there a downside to useing launchers?

Post by Coon »

ZDL 3.1a does it for me. It sure has a few limitations, one of them sort of annoying but other than that, it's a rock-solid, highly flexible, user-friendly, small and fast ZDoom launcher.

Since I have almost 700mb worth of official (comercially) classic Doom engine-based iwads and pwads in different folders plus an undefined amount of user wads, managing all this from the command line is as painful as it is pointless.
User avatar
ace
Posts: 787
Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2005 10:14 am
Location: Just south of the True North

Re: Is there a downside to useing launchers?

Post by ace »

I personally set up WADs and PK3s to open with any program I please upon right-clicking. I can easily edit with DB, XWE, or SLumpEd or run them in (G)ZDoom that way.

Of course, it doesn't work if I'm opening multiple WADs/PK3s with (G)ZDoom that way (causes separate instances of the program to launch), but in that case drag-n-drop suffices. I've never been too fond of launchers just as a matter of principle, though perhaps I've just gotten the wrong impression from Legacy, Doomsday, Quake2Evolved and a few others... Admittedly I've yet to try ZDL.
User avatar
Enjay
 
 
Posts: 27115
Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2003 4:58 pm
Location: Scotland
Contact:

Re: Is there a downside to useing launchers?

Post by Enjay »

Coon wrote:one of them sort of annoying
As a matter of interest, what is the annoying thing?
User avatar
Coon
Posts: 147
Joined: Mon Jul 14, 2008 7:42 am

Re: Is there a downside to useing launchers?

Post by Coon »

Enjay wrote:
Coon wrote:one of them sort of annoying
As a matter of interest, what is the annoying thing?
You can't save iwad + pwad combinations snowberry-style. E.g HEXEN.WAD + HEXDD.WAD, tnt.wad + TNT31.WAD.
User avatar
Enjay
 
 
Posts: 27115
Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2003 4:58 pm
Location: Scotland
Contact:

Re: Is there a downside to useing launchers?

Post by Enjay »

Coon wrote:You can't save iwad + pwad combinations snowberry-style. E.g HEXEN.WAD + HEXDD.WAD, tnt.wad + TNT31.WAD.
I can't say that I've ever tried, but it is possible to save configurations. Do these not do what you want? Also, I don't remember specifically how I set it up, but I have HexDD set in my IWAD list and it works just fine. I think, however, that it may simply have hexdd.wad set as the IWAD and then rely on Zdoom's native ability to use hexen.wad before it.
Post Reply

Return to “General”