SVN Repo?

Moderator: GZDoom Developers

User avatar
Graf Zahl
Lead GZDoom+Raze Developer
Lead GZDoom+Raze Developer
Posts: 49223
Joined: Sat Jul 19, 2003 10:19 am
Location: Germany

Post by Graf Zahl »

You couldn't be more wrong.
User avatar
Nash
 
 
Posts: 17487
Joined: Mon Oct 27, 2003 12:07 am
Location: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Contact:

Post by Nash »

Yay!
User avatar
Grubber
Posts: 1031
Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2003 12:19 am
Location: Czech Republic
Contact:

Post by Grubber »

@Graf: Some info about .96x DECORATE features is here - can you please fix/move/remove the no longer needed stuff from it?
User avatar
Graf Zahl
Lead GZDoom+Raze Developer
Lead GZDoom+Raze Developer
Posts: 49223
Joined: Sat Jul 19, 2003 10:19 am
Location: Germany

Post by Graf Zahl »

I'll remove that page once I'm done. So far I have documented all the action functions and thus removed that part from the page and replaced it with a link.
zloba
Posts: 108
Joined: Mon May 10, 2004 12:09 am

Post by zloba »

sweet!!! having an SVN repo was high on my wishlist for ZDoom, and now it's there :)
User avatar
QBasicer
Posts: 766
Joined: Tue Sep 16, 2003 3:03 pm
Contact:

Post by QBasicer »

I can't seem to compile:
c:\documents and settings\cody harris\my documents\svn\zdoom\tools\lemon\lemon.c(2351): warning C4715: 'preprocess_input' : not all control paths return a value
FLAC error PRJ0019: A tool returned an error code from "Assembling c:\Documents and Settings\Cody Harris\My Documents\svn\zdoom\Flac\ia32\lpc_asm.nasm..."
zdoom error PRJ0019: A tool returned an error code from "Assembling c:\Documents and Settings\Cody Harris\My Documents\svn\zdoom\src\tmap3.nas..."
wadsrc error PRJ0019: A tool returned an error code from "Performing Makefile project actions"
wadsrc fatal error U1073: don't know how to make 'strfhelp.o'
wadsrc fatal error U1077: '"c:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio .NET 2003\Vc7\bin\nmake.exe"' : return code '0x2'
c:\Documents and Settings\Cody Harris\My Documents\svn\zdoom\tools\lemon\lemon.c(3056): warning C4018: '>=' : signed/unsigned mismatch
y.tab.c(753): warning C4065: switch statement contains 'default' but no 'case' labels
c:\Documents and Settings\Cody Harris\My Documents\svn\zdoom\tools\re2c\scanner.cc(501): warning C4101: 'yyaccept' : unreferenced local variable
c:\Documents and Settings\Cody Harris\My Documents\svn\zdoom\tools\re2c\scanner.cc(11): warning C4102: 'yy1' : unreferenced label
c:\Documents and Settings\Cody Harris\My Documents\svn\zdoom\tools\re2c\scanner.cc(72): warning C4102: 'yy16' : unreferenced label
c:\Documents and Settings\Cody Harris\My Documents\svn\zdoom\tools\re2c\scanner.cc(390): warning C4102: 'yy75' : unreferenced label
c:\Documents and Settings\Cody Harris\My Documents\svn\zdoom\tools\re2c\scanner.cc(503): warning C4102: 'yy94' : unreferenced label
c:\Documents and Settings\Cody Harris\My Documents\svn\zdoom\tools\re2c\dfa.cc(130): warning C4244: '=' : conversion from 'ushort' to 'Char', possible loss of data
c:\Documents and Settings\Cody Harris\My Documents\svn\zdoom\tools\re2c\actions.cc(30): warning C4244: 'argument' : conversion from 'const ushort' to 'uchar', possible loss of data
C:\UnixUtils\usr\local\wbin\bison.simple(472): warning C4244: 'initializing' : conversion from '__w64 int' to 'unsigned int', possible loss of data
C:\UnixUtils\usr\local\wbin\bison.simple(472): warning C4244: 'initializing' : conversion from '__w64 int' to 'unsigned int', possible loss of data
User avatar
Bio Hazard
Posts: 4019
Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2003 8:15 pm
Location: ferret ~/C/ZDL $
Contact:

Post by Bio Hazard »

It's not like you play ZDoom anyway. :mrgreen:
dennisj1
Posts: 399
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2004 1:46 pm
Location: Superior, WI

Post by dennisj1 »

How do I check out the ZDoom source from the SVN (other than getting it one file at a time via the web interface)? I have MSVC 2005 Express, and I think it'll compile with that. (ZDoom.sln looks to be a MSVC8 project file.)
zloba
Posts: 108
Joined: Mon May 10, 2004 12:09 am

Post by zloba »

How do I check out the ZDoom source from the SVN
go to http://subversion.tigris.org/project_packages.html (scroll down to Windows downloads)

option A: using the command-line tools: (assuming they're in the PATH)

cd /path/to/where/you/want/sources
svn checkout http://mancubus.net/svn/hosted/zdoom

option B: using TortoiseSVN

navigate an Explorer window to the folder of your choice
find "checkout" in context menus
enter repository URL: http://mancubus.net/svn/hosted/zdoom
(i'm not sure about exact details - i rarely use this)
zloba
Posts: 108
Joined: Mon May 10, 2004 12:09 am

Post by zloba »

Lemonzest
Posts: 327
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:19 pm
Location: On your boards, trolling your threads!!!

Post by Lemonzest »

would it be possible for someone to build a windows version of the new SVN code? not all of us are coders and it would be nice to play with the new stuff and help find bugs :)
User avatar
Graf Zahl
Lead GZDoom+Raze Developer
Lead GZDoom+Raze Developer
Posts: 49223
Joined: Sat Jul 19, 2003 10:19 am
Location: Germany

Post by Graf Zahl »

No. The current version still contains critical bugs and a working ZDoom.wad can't be created. At least one round of bugfixes is still required to make this usable.
User avatar
Alterworldruler
Posts: 622
Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2005 7:31 am

Post by Alterworldruler »

If 2.0.99 comes out then gzdoom will be switched to 2.0.99 code?
zloba
Posts: 108
Joined: Mon May 10, 2004 12:09 am

Post by zloba »

btw, how about GZDoom (and whatever other major branches) also using an SVN repository? Either within the same repository, or independently..
User avatar
Hirogen2
Posts: 2033
Joined: Sat Jul 19, 2003 6:15 am
Operating System Version (Optional): Tumbleweed x64
Graphics Processor: Intel with Vulkan/Metal Support
Location: Central Germany
Contact:

Post by Hirogen2 »

randy wrote:
SlayeR wrote:Wasn't there a ZDoom SourceForge account? Why not use that?
Considering that there isn't even supposed to be a ZDoom SourceForge project because it isn't "free enough," I think using SourceForge now would be a bad idea.
Well, it passed the registration back then. Though I think I made a slight mistake back then, saying that the Doom code was GPL (is it?). [Oh and if you're asking, you did allow me giving a try at re-registering the project (after your reg was rejected) someday in June/July 2003. Though you never used it then.]
Post Reply

Return to “Closed Feature Suggestions [GZDoom]”