60 doing strange things to windows

Bugs that have been investigated and resolved somehow.

Moderator: GZDoom Developers

Forum rules
Please don't bump threads here if you have a problem - it will often be forgotten about if you do. Instead, make a new thread here.
User avatar
HotWax
Posts: 10002
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2003 6:18 pm
Location: Idaho Falls, ID

Post by HotWax »

[plug shameless=true welldeserved=very true]http://www.1coolpc.com[/plug]
User avatar
Ultraviolet
Posts: 1152
Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2003 9:08 pm
Location: PROJECT DETAILS CLASSIFIED.

Post by Ultraviolet »

And this, I believe, would be a pretty good RAM cooling mechanism available on that site. Cheap, easy... ( http://www.1coolpc.com/ramsinks.htm ) If you use that one, be sure to put a thermal sensor on your RAM and let me know how it works out for you. I'm curious, see. I've been doing a lot of research because I'm working on putting a new box together. I've got no money so I have done a lot of planning and no buying.

For some more money, you could get one of these ( http://www.1coolpc.com/memcoolplus.htm ) and one or two more of these ( http://www.1coolpc.com/memcoolcopper.htm or http://www.1coolpc.com/memcool.htm -- only a $3 difference, so get the former) if you have more than one stick of RAM.
User avatar
Bio Hazard
Posts: 4019
Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2003 8:15 pm
Location: ferret ~/C/ZDL $
Contact:

Post by Bio Hazard »

! there is such a thing as thermal adhesive? and all this time ive been using mustard...

actually the hommade heatsink works pretty good! (was 57C, now 65C) [EDIT] :) [/EDIT]

BTW, good for you, building your own computer is the only way to go...


i am growing tired of this topic...
Last edited by Bio Hazard on Fri Jan 02, 2004 10:05 pm, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
randi
Site Admin
Posts: 7749
Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2003 10:30 pm
Contact:

Post by randi »

Did you use 2.0.59 before and it worked fine? Because the differences between 2.0.59 and 2.0.60 are quite minor.
User avatar
Bio Hazard
Posts: 4019
Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2003 8:15 pm
Location: ferret ~/C/ZDL $
Contact:

Post by Bio Hazard »

hmm... it happens with 59 too... i guess its just my problem,

the chance of it locking up is:
2.0.60: 80%
2.0.59: 60%

i think it has to do with the resolution switch et exit (going from 1024x768 to 2048x1152)

anyway i guess ill have to live with it...
User avatar
Ultraviolet
Posts: 1152
Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2003 9:08 pm
Location: PROJECT DETAILS CLASSIFIED.

Post by Ultraviolet »

BioHazard wrote:works pretty good! (was 57C, now 65C)
WTF? Look over those numbers again, would you?
Last edited by Ultraviolet on Fri Jan 02, 2004 10:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Bio Hazard
Posts: 4019
Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2003 8:15 pm
Location: ferret ~/C/ZDL $
Contact:

Post by Bio Hazard »

Ultraviolet wrote:
BioHazard wrote:works pretty good! (was 57C, now 65C)
WTF? Look over those numbers again, would you?
sarcasam UV... sarcasam... (forgot the smiley)
User avatar
Ultraviolet
Posts: 1152
Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2003 9:08 pm
Location: PROJECT DETAILS CLASSIFIED.

Post by Ultraviolet »

OK, well, give me your real numbers now. :P
User avatar
Bio Hazard
Posts: 4019
Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2003 8:15 pm
Location: ferret ~/C/ZDL $
Contact:

Post by Bio Hazard »

it actually didnt do anything... it remains the same as before

maybe its not attached properly... ill mess with it later...[reallytinytext]or ill go buy some real ones[/reallytinytext]
User avatar
Ultraviolet
Posts: 1152
Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2003 9:08 pm
Location: PROJECT DETAILS CLASSIFIED.

Post by Ultraviolet »

It didn't do anything because the heatsink is not in proper contact with the chips on each module. Also, the thermal sensor should be on the chip, not the card. ALSO, heat sinks won't do much good for long if your case's airflow isn't any good, because there will nothing to carry away the heat and it'll just travel back into the chip the heatsink is sitting on.
User avatar
Bio Hazard
Posts: 4019
Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2003 8:15 pm
Location: ferret ~/C/ZDL $
Contact:

Post by Bio Hazard »

with a little bit of research i managed to figure out that the process "zdoom" (that is zdoom im assuming) does not end upon quitting the program, and ending it manually dosent kill it either...

also

this bug dosent happen when i run zdoom in a window with capped fps and vsync
User avatar
randi
Site Admin
Posts: 7749
Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2003 10:30 pm
Contact:

Post by randi »

Vsync is never used in windowed mode.
User avatar
Bio Hazard
Posts: 4019
Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2003 8:15 pm
Location: ferret ~/C/ZDL $
Contact:

Post by Bio Hazard »

those are the options i changed between the last time it locked and when it started working

i thinkl its just fullscreen that does anything
User avatar
randi
Site Admin
Posts: 7749
Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2003 10:30 pm
Contact:

Post by randi »

Bio Hazard wrote:with a little bit of research i managed to figure out that the process "zdoom" (that is zdoom im assuming) does not end upon quitting the program
In other words, its the same as this?
User avatar
Bio Hazard
Posts: 4019
Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2003 8:15 pm
Location: ferret ~/C/ZDL $
Contact:

Post by Bio Hazard »

hmm... i think so, but the process dosent stop. (or is that what "stays in memory" means?)
Post Reply

Return to “Closed Bugs [GZDoom]”