Fluidsynth demanding on older cpu's?

ZDoom LE, Pentium 133's, Windows 98, and DOS 3.1 all go here! A bygone era, of particular interest to some folks.

Fluidsynth demanding on older cpu's?

Postby invictius » Fri Feb 16, 2018 8:37 am

Have been using synths that require an application installation, which are unreliable in my experience so I tried this. The wiki says it's cpu-demanding but how much so? Too much for one of the later single core p4's?
Joined: 03 Aug 2012

Re: Fluidsynth demanding on older cpu's?

Postby Rachael » Fri Feb 16, 2018 9:55 am

Moved to legacy discussion.
User avatar
Joined: 13 Jan 2004
Discord: Rachael#3767
Twitch ID: madamerachelle
Github ID: madame-rachelle
Operating System: Windows 10/8.1/8/201x 64-bit
OS Test Version: No (Using Stable Public Version)
Graphics Processor: nVidia with Vulkan support

Re: Fluidsynth demanding on older cpu's?

Postby Graf Zahl » Fri Feb 16, 2018 11:34 am

Back in the day it got heavily criticized for being a CPU hog, but I cannot seem to find any numbers. It got added long after multi-core CPUs became commonplace, though.
User avatar
Graf Zahl
Lead GZDoom+Raze Developer
Lead GZDoom+Raze Developer
Joined: 19 Jul 2003
Location: Germany

Re: Fluidsynth demanding on older cpu's?

Postby drfrag » Fri Feb 16, 2018 2:31 pm

I don't know but it will be clearly slower than virtualmidisynth on that machine, just compare.
User avatar
Os voy a romper a pedazos!
Vintage GZDoom Developer
Joined: 23 Apr 2004
Location: Spain
Discord: drfrag#3555
Github ID: drfrag666

Re: Fluidsynth demanding on older cpu's?

Postby Gez » Fri Feb 16, 2018 2:39 pm

Randi compared it to the other MIDI synth options that existed back then (like TiMidity) and it was sensibly slower on the single-core laptop it was tested on.
Joined: 06 Jul 2007

Return to Legacy Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests