ZETH: Linedef 190 patch

Discuss anything ZDoom-related that doesn't fall into one of the other categories.

ZETH: Linedef 190 patch

Postby Hirogen2 » Sun Oct 05, 2003 10:38 am

If this has not applied to ZETH yet, or for anybody who needs it, here is a diff patch that inserts the 190 linedef type.
Code: Select allExpand view
--- specialz.old        2003-10-05 18:35:48.000000000 +0200
+++ specialz.cfg        2003-10-04 20:21:22.000000000 +0200
@@ -6,6 +6,12 @@
 ##############################################################################
 ############################## Enumerations List #############################
 ##############################################################################
+"StaticInit"
+0,     "Gravity"
+1,     "Light/Fog"
+2,     "Damage"
+255,   "TextureSky"
+
 "Up/Down"
 0,     "Up"
 1,     "Down"
@@ -300,6 +306,7 @@
 224,   "Scroll_Ceiling",       "224 Scroll_Ceiling",
 999,"-","-","-----","-        ","-        ","-        ","-        ","-
 9,     "Line_Horizon",         "009 Line_Horizon",
+190,    "Static_Init",          "190 Static_Init",
 182,   "Line_Mirror",          "182 Line_Mirror",
 208,   "TranslucentLine",      "208 TranslucentLine",
User avatar
Hirogen2
 
Joined: 19 Jul 2003
Location: Central Germany
Github ID: jengelh
Operating System: RedHat-like Linux (RHEL, Fedora, CentOS, etc) 64-bit
Graphics Processor: Intel (Modern GZDoom)

Postby Chris » Sun Oct 05, 2003 11:27 pm

Applied. :)
User avatar
Chris
 
Joined: 17 Jul 2003

Postby Hirogen2 » Mon Oct 06, 2003 5:55 am

I hope any changes get backported to DOS Zeth too, just in case...
User avatar
Hirogen2
 
Joined: 19 Jul 2003
Location: Central Germany
Github ID: jengelh
Operating System: RedHat-like Linux (RHEL, Fedora, CentOS, etc) 64-bit
Graphics Processor: Intel (Modern GZDoom)

Postby Chris » Tue Oct 07, 2003 1:16 am

The code I have should still compile under DJGPP, but unfortunately I can't test it now that I'm on Win2K, and Win98 won't recognize the FAT32 partition where the code is..
User avatar
Chris
 
Joined: 17 Jul 2003

Postby Hirogen2 » Tue Oct 07, 2003 5:27 am

What? Impossible. Win98 itself uses FAT32. Did you probably mean Win98 doesnot support NTFS? Or W2K doesnot support VFAT/FAT32(which is unlikely)?
User avatar
Hirogen2
 
Joined: 19 Jul 2003
Location: Central Germany
Github ID: jengelh
Operating System: RedHat-like Linux (RHEL, Fedora, CentOS, etc) 64-bit
Graphics Processor: Intel (Modern GZDoom)

Postby Chris » Tue Oct 07, 2003 9:13 pm

For some reason, Win98 detects my FAT32 fat table as corrupt, and a dir listing confirms that. However Win2K sees it just fine, and scandisk turns up nothing. What's the size limit on a FAT32 partition, or for a single file on a FAT32 partition, btw? It's been running fine until I put 2K on, and the partition in question hasn't changed, except it's a lot more full now..

Though I find it odd that Win98 refuses to boot up because of a bad partition that it's not even on..
User avatar
Chris
 
Joined: 17 Jul 2003

Postby Cyb » Tue Oct 07, 2003 10:34 pm

hehe win98 sux : P
Cyb
 
Joined: 15 Jul 2003

Postby Hirogen2 » Wed Oct 08, 2003 5:30 am

Cyb wrote:hehe win98 sux : P
So does XP.
Limit on VFAT/FAT32 is at least more than 40GB.
User avatar
Hirogen2
 
Joined: 19 Jul 2003
Location: Central Germany
Github ID: jengelh
Operating System: RedHat-like Linux (RHEL, Fedora, CentOS, etc) 64-bit
Graphics Processor: Intel (Modern GZDoom)

Postby Chris » Wed Oct 08, 2003 6:21 am

The biggest file on the partition is 713MB. The partition itself is about 12GB. Having some folders shared for a LAN wouldn't mess it up, would it?
User avatar
Chris
 
Joined: 17 Jul 2003

Postby Hirogen2 » Wed Oct 08, 2003 2:07 pm

No, so far I know not. I had friends who gave all space to a Windows parition
because they had not the Linux CDs yet, and well... giving all 38GB to a FAT32
partition à la Win98. The biggest file, however is the usual 2.147GB (2^31).
Why should it create network problems? 713MB is not much, just an ISO.
Then again, I do not have one 713MB files but loads of 1KB files of splitted
IWADs :P works fine. Takes long.
User avatar
Hirogen2
 
Joined: 19 Jul 2003
Location: Central Germany
Github ID: jengelh
Operating System: RedHat-like Linux (RHEL, Fedora, CentOS, etc) 64-bit
Graphics Processor: Intel (Modern GZDoom)

Postby Chris » Wed Oct 08, 2003 3:51 pm

Why should it create network problems?


Not network problems, but file system problems. I don't know much about networking so I don't know if the "shared" attribute is an internal Windows setting, or if it's set in the file system. And if it's set in the file system, I could see why Win98 might not like that.
User avatar
Chris
 
Joined: 17 Jul 2003

Postby randi » Wed Oct 08, 2003 3:58 pm

Have you tried running chkdsk under 2000:
Code: Select allExpand view
chkdsk c: /f
I believe the sharing information is stored in the registry.
Hirogen2 wrote:
Cyb wrote:hehe win98 sux : P
So does XP.

So does Linux. :-P

Oh no! Forget I said that. I did not mean to dis the perfect OS!
User avatar
randi
Site Admin
 
Joined: 09 Jul 2003

Postby bimshwel » Thu Oct 09, 2003 10:05 am

Fight the power!
User avatar
bimshwel
only as old as I feel, and I feel like dirt
 
Joined: 15 Jul 2003
Location: misplaced
Discord: bimshwel #7516

Postby Hirogen2 » Thu Oct 09, 2003 12:33 pm

So does Linux. :-P
Oh no! Forget I said that. I did not mean to dis the perfect OS!

I hope so for you!
BTW if you do not want to port it back over to Linux, either by laziness or
non-interest, you might consider hiring someone using Sourceforge's "Help
Wanted" system. Of course it's free in every aspect(tm) :)
User avatar
Hirogen2
 
Joined: 19 Jul 2003
Location: Central Germany
Github ID: jengelh
Operating System: RedHat-like Linux (RHEL, Fedora, CentOS, etc) 64-bit
Graphics Processor: Intel (Modern GZDoom)

Postby HotWax » Fri Oct 10, 2003 3:30 am

Hirogen2 wrote:
So does Linux. :-P
Oh no! Forget I said that. I did not mean to dis the perfect OS!

I hope so for you!
BTW if you do not want to port it back over to Linux, either by laziness or
non-interest, you might consider hiring someone using Sourceforge's "Help
Wanted" system. Of course it's free in every aspect(tm) :)


Or he could just make the source available so anyone who is "not lazy" and is "interested" could do their own damn port.

Wait a minute...
User avatar
HotWax
Do what you must, and pay the price later.
 
Joined: 18 Jul 2003
Location: Idaho Falls, ID

Next

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests