ZDoom

by **HotWax** » Sun Sep 28, 2003 3:13 am

Bio Hazard wrote:the following is completly neutral (not an insult)
(heh saying that is like summoning HotWax)

?

by **Sparky** » Sun Sep 28, 2003 9:32 am

those look great
maybe you guys should start a logo contest for zdoom or somethin

by **Hirogen2** » Sun Sep 28, 2003 12:17 pm

My opinions so far
wildweasel's Z is looking like Ol' America's Western

doesnot fit
ZDBioHazard's is a bit color-less (just a simple red and a simple black and not even anti-aliasing), and it is way too big.

Edit: logos changed a little and posted further down kthx

by **wildweasel** » Sun Sep 28, 2003 12:23 pm

Bio Hazard wrote:
wildweasel wrote:Here's my updated attempt.

the following is completly neutral (not an insult)
(heh saying that is like summoning HotWax)

hmmm... it looks like you are trying to dupe the ZDaemon logo a little... and ZDaemon sux...

also having Z and DOOM as 2 fonts breaks it into 2 words: "Z Doom" and its eaiser read "ZDoom"

that logo just dosent do it for me...

JMWO

Yeah, I could have made the Z into a better font like an LCD or something. I've never really seen the ZDaemon logo, so any resemblence is unintentional.

by **Bio Hazard** » Sun Sep 28, 2003 12:24 pm

Hirogen2 wrote:ZDBioHazard's is way too big.

well id leave it to randy to scale it down

i like doing evrything in hi-res

by **Bio Hazard** » Sun Sep 28, 2003 1:46 pm

and heres another one!

Im on a ROLL!

by **Hirogen2** » Sun Sep 28, 2003 1:52 pm

Watch your quota.

by **Bio Hazard** » Sun Sep 28, 2003 2:10 pm

woah... i think hirogen wins

hmmm... i need a fire texture like that.

by **Bio Hazard** » Sun Sep 28, 2003 3:08 pm

alrighty i did another one...

i went REALLY simple on this one

heh... maybe i should get back to ZChexQuest huh?

by **Bio Hazard** » Sun Sep 28, 2003 5:11 pm

yee haw! another one!

hirogen: you blur, i blur

this is fun!

by **Zell** » Sun Sep 28, 2003 5:31 pm

have to say i have liked hirgoens best =D

by **Bio Hazard** » Sun Sep 28, 2003 5:45 pm

the problem with hirogen's is that hed have to use the bottom one
because .gif cant have translucency like .png, its either colored or its not nothing in between.
so most of the cooler effects like motion blur cant be used outside the main image

and the bottom one of hirogen's logos is not nearly as cool as his others (the ones with blur)

thats why all his images have backgrounds and arent see-thru

that was not a rant, just some info on the limits of logo images...

and BTW: where is randy? come on randy! we need ideas!

by **Zell** » Sun Sep 28, 2003 5:59 pm

if you just copy+paste the image into paint, and save as .PNG, viola =D

by **Bio Hazard** » Sun Sep 28, 2003 6:05 pm

Zell wrote:if you just copy+paste the image into paint, and save as .PNG, viola =D

what would that accomplish? why not just save it as a PNG in PhotoShop?

if you meant why not make it a PNG so that you could have translucency, you cant. displaying a png in IE wont do translucency. only .gif files will get an alpha channel applied, so you are stuck with that limited format...

also MSpain for <WinXP cant save as PNG anyway

by **Eevee** » Sun Sep 28, 2003 7:06 pm

well, it IS possible to coax IE into sorta maybe displaying translucent PNG's correctly some of the time, using a .htc file and the 'behavior' CSS property Microsoft made up. of course this means that your CSS won't validate, but it's either that or flip IE off. which.. really isn't that bad an idea.

ZDoom

ZDoom logo

Who is online