Eruanna wrote:So do what you need to do - educate me on what parts need to be dynamic and where it should pull content from. As dpJudas said - it's easy enough to separate the blocks of code Joomla generates and scriptify whatever parts needed on my own.
Rachael wrote:No, Randi has not given the OK.
Ditto. I suspect such a rebranding effort would be much like Time Warner's research and investigations as to whether or not they should change the Atari logo after they acquired that company. (So legend goes, Atari spent four digits on that logo, and Time Warner spent six to be told not to fuck with it, because it was so instantly recognisableRachael wrote:That's really up to Graf. Personally I don't see much reason to do this.
It's a "it'd be nice" thing, as I understand it.Nevander wrote:I'm out of the loop here but why does the name have to be changed? Or is that just an idea, not that it has to be?
Kinsie wrote:Idle Thought: QZDoom should keep being a thing after the Big Merge, and be used as like an "experimental fork" for things that aren't quite, or may never quite be, at the point where Graf is comfy with them.
Users browsing this forum: madsnark and 2 guests