BlablaSnarboo wrote:Don't post if you have nothing to add to the discussion.Tormentor667 wrote:No Screens = No Download!

Thx for the shots btw
BlablaSnarboo wrote:Don't post if you have nothing to add to the discussion.Tormentor667 wrote:No Screens = No Download!
It's ten megabytes. Are you on dial-up or something? It probably takes about that much downloading to visit one page of your website =PTormentor667 wrote:BlablaSnarboo wrote:Don't post if you have nothing to add to the discussion.Tormentor667 wrote:No Screens = No Download!I am not going to download such a big file if I don't get something to see before, that's why I said "No screenshots = No Download".
Thx for the shots btw
Enjay wrote:I've looked at the glowing ball things and I suggest that you change their DECORATE code to something like this:
Spoiler:Then make sure you remove the translucent flag from them in the editor as this overrides the DECORATE translucency and additive effect. You may want to tweak the alpha value to your tastes.
Oh, and purely from a tidy housekeeping point of view. You have two lumps in your WAD called decorate. It is better practice to give them different names and them use the #include function to load them all. eg, if you called one of them DECSFX then put the line #include DECSFX in the lump called DECORATE (usually right at the start) then both the decorate lump and the DECSFX lumps will be loaded.
Yeah, I have thought about a more simple design as well... but, we will seeNash wrote:Yeah Torm no offense but I really, REALLY hate your website design! You need to make something more simple, less flashy stuff that loads faster!
I think that website is badass, and usually I hate all that high-bandwidth flash shit. In the case of realm667 I think it's really tastefully done, though, and I would be sad if it changed. Well, some of those fading image flash things could be replaced with a js image rotator, but that's about all I would change.Tormentor667 wrote:Yeah, I have thought about a more simple design as well
The shrewdness surely wasn't necessary then if you actually had reasoning behind it.Tormentor667 wrote:Yeah, I have thought about a more simple design as well... but, we will seeNash wrote:Yeah Torm no offense but I really, REALLY hate your website design! You need to make something more simple, less flashy stuff that loads faster!Conc. the 10MB download: The connection to the download source was very slow for me, that's why I wanted to have screens to see if the waiting time makes sense.
The guy with sattelite internet, actually, doesn't have a problem with itNash wrote:Yeah Torm no offense but I really, REALLY hate your website design! You need to make something more simple, less flashy stuff that loads faster!