Based on what i have seen, there is no incentive to do the upgrade and ill block it when it would be asked.
Which ironically is a tale of its own. My dad, separated from the Windows church and into the communion of Linux, found that Windows wanted to install a few KB updates. For some reason Microsoft still cannot understand that a simple update for a simple program should not necessiate a full on restart of the computer, but i digress.
The problem was that this update started downloading and executing instantly.
Knowing there is a way to block these, i found that Microsoft used to have a tool to ''hide'' these updates. Except by hiding, you also had the option to actively ignore indefinitely instead of the 2 weeks it does now.
Since this is something useful, Microsoft actually removed it from their own site.
My dad ended up at Majorgeeks after giving him a pointer and is happily living since.
Why this rant? Well, because if Microsoft is so hell bent on the end user having to install updates beyond the fact that they need to restart for the tiniest thing that they actively remove any end-user choice to surpress said update indefinitely, then you can imagine how i think about the W11 ''requirements''.
The fact you can bypass it with a registry edit makes it laughable. I much rather would install Linux on the thing and just start getting adjusted to that, instead.
rant over.
