Watermarks = S***!

If it's not ZDoom, it goes here.
User avatar
Bashe
Posts: 1680
Joined: Mon Nov 10, 2003 11:32 am
Location: Ohio

Re: Watermarks = S***!

Post by Bashe »

Your video looks like the result of YouTube trying to auto-stabilize it. Did it ask you about that?
Gez
 
 
Posts: 17635
Joined: Fri Jul 06, 2007 3:22 pm

Re: Watermarks = S***!

Post by Gez »

There's a big difference between what I did and what would be needed for your program.

What I did basically required no programming knowledge at all. Open exe in hex editor, search for PNG header, find out that there is one, replace embedded PNG data with another, save, and run. None of the actual code was changed, the program still behaved like it did and inserted a watermark onto the image -- it's just that the watermark was now invisible so the image was clean.

Here though, we have something that distorts the image. It's not doing that by compositing a watermark on it, it's performing deformations on the images. To get rid of that, you'll need to change the actual code. And since all you have is the compiled form, you'll need to be a wizard at reverse engineering and disassembly to do so.
User avatar
Ozymandias81
Posts: 2051
Joined: Thu Jul 04, 2013 8:01 am
Discord: Ozymandias81#2768
Github ID: Ozymandias81
Operating System: Windows Vista/7/2008 64-bit
OS Test Version: No (Using Stable Public Version)
Graphics Processor: nVidia with Vulkan support
Location: Mount Olympus, Mars

Re: Watermarks = S***!

Post by Ozymandias81 »

Bashe wrote:Your video looks like the result of YouTube trying to auto-stabilize it. Did it ask you about that?
Oh yes, now I'm realizing that... after 8 hours of PC my mind acts weird, and that's the result... I was wondering why my 2nd video didn't have that s***, and now here's the answer: MY ONLY FAULT! :bang:
Thankx Bashe, now I will feel more confident grabbing my videos...

@Gez
It's just as I suspected ... is the time of Amiga 've been toying around with hex-editors (personally I use Ultraedit32), but at this point it seems that I do not need anything... Thankx anyway Gez...
Last edited by Ozymandias81 on Fri Feb 20, 2015 1:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Siggi
Posts: 3288
Joined: Sun Oct 03, 2004 8:57 am
Location: South Africa

Re: Watermarks = S***!

Post by Siggi »

Harold likes watermarks.
Image
User avatar
Raziel236
Posts: 313
Joined: Tue Jul 02, 2013 7:26 pm

Re: Watermarks = S***!

Post by Raziel236 »

All that has to be done to get rid of the watermark is for the video to be stretched a little vertically..
User avatar
DoomRater
Posts: 8265
Joined: Wed Jul 28, 2004 8:21 am
Discord: DoomRater#6308
Location: WATR HQ

Re: Watermarks = S***!

Post by DoomRater »

Gez wrote:What I did basically required no programming knowledge at all. Open exe in hex editor, search for PNG header, find out that there is one, replace embedded PNG data with another, save, and run. None of the actual code was changed, the program still behaved like it did and inserted a watermark onto the image -- it's just that the watermark was now invisible so the image was clean.
Programming knowledge or not that was brilliant.
User avatar
NeuralStunner
 
 
Posts: 12298
Joined: Tue Jul 21, 2009 12:04 pm
Discord: NeuralStunner#4201
Operating System: Windows Vista/7/2008 64-bit
Graphics Processor: nVidia (Modern GZDoom)
Location: capital N, capital S, no space

Re: Watermarks = S***!

Post by NeuralStunner »

The watermark is a (stated) downside to the free/trial version. I'm not sure why it's so terrible for the company to have an interest in making money, and a basically harmless incentive for customers.

Trialware practices that are actually BS:
  • Disabled saving. How am I supposed to determine it doesn't output needlessly bloated or half-broken files? Bonus points if the program provides watermarked previews.
  • A copy listed as a "free version" that is actually a 30-day trial, which you only realize after installing it. Either it's a less-featured, no-charge version of the product, or it's a temporary evaluation of the full product.
Combine these with every search engine's insistence that "freeware" and "free download" are the same thing, and trying to find actually free programs is 90% bait-and-switch.
User avatar
Ozymandias81
Posts: 2051
Joined: Thu Jul 04, 2013 8:01 am
Discord: Ozymandias81#2768
Github ID: Ozymandias81
Operating System: Windows Vista/7/2008 64-bit
OS Test Version: No (Using Stable Public Version)
Graphics Processor: nVidia with Vulkan support
Location: Mount Olympus, Mars

Re: Watermarks = S***!

Post by Ozymandias81 »

Bandicam = bought. The End.
User avatar
NeuralStunner
 
 
Posts: 12298
Joined: Tue Jul 21, 2009 12:04 pm
Discord: NeuralStunner#4201
Operating System: Windows Vista/7/2008 64-bit
Graphics Processor: nVidia (Modern GZDoom)
Location: capital N, capital S, no space

Re: Watermarks = S***!

Post by NeuralStunner »

Thus demonstrating that the watermark feature did its job, and so is actually awesome. ;)
User avatar
leileilol
Posts: 4427
Joined: Sun May 30, 2004 10:16 am
Location: GNU/Hell

Re: Watermarks = S***!

Post by leileilol »

VirtualDub's an option too, not many think about the 'dub for this purpose.
User avatar
ETTiNGRiNDER
Posts: 766
Joined: Sat Jan 30, 2010 7:02 pm

Re: Watermarks = S***!

Post by ETTiNGRiNDER »

NeuralStunner wrote:Combine these with every search engine's insistence that "freeware" and "free download" are the same thing, and trying to find actually free programs is 90% bait-and-switch.
http://snapfiles.com/ ?
User avatar
Ozymandias81
Posts: 2051
Joined: Thu Jul 04, 2013 8:01 am
Discord: Ozymandias81#2768
Github ID: Ozymandias81
Operating System: Windows Vista/7/2008 64-bit
OS Test Version: No (Using Stable Public Version)
Graphics Processor: nVidia with Vulkan support
Location: Mount Olympus, Mars

Re: Watermarks = S***!

Post by Ozymandias81 »

Some other interesting stuffed site here... thankx Ettin...
User avatar
NeuralStunner
 
 
Posts: 12298
Joined: Tue Jul 21, 2009 12:04 pm
Discord: NeuralStunner#4201
Operating System: Windows Vista/7/2008 64-bit
Graphics Processor: nVidia (Modern GZDoom)
Location: capital N, capital S, no space

Re: Watermarks = S***!

Post by NeuralStunner »

leileilol wrote:VirtualDub's an option too, not many think about the 'dub for this purpose.
Last time I tried its capture tool, it did not have great results. I don't know if my system wasn't up to it or what.

(Marginally related: I cannot VDub to output with the CamStudio codec in GZIP mode. If there's a better lossless compression codec for AVI it would be neat to have.)
ETTiNGRiNDER wrote:http://snapfiles.com/ ?
Bookmarked! Will start looking there for stuff. Thanks. :)
User avatar
Enjay
 
 
Posts: 26403
Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2003 4:58 pm
Location: Scotland

Re: Watermarks = S***!

Post by Enjay »

NeuralStunner wrote:A copy listed as a "free version" that is actually a 30-day trial, which you only realize after installing it.

every search engine's insistence that "freeware" and "free download" are the same thing
Both of these. Grrrrr! :x
User avatar
leileilol
Posts: 4427
Joined: Sun May 30, 2004 10:16 am
Location: GNU/Hell

Re: Watermarks = S***!

Post by leileilol »

You can't fully trust open source software either because of some scummy derivatives, like WinGIMP and obviously-not-authorized OpenArena's renamed mobile versions (they exist and the best way I can do something about them is to make the real OA more better and popular, than waste my devtime on the litigations)

Return to “Off-Topic”