Classic weapons vs. high-tech weapons?

If it's not ZDoom, it goes here.

Classic or energy weapons?

Classic
20
74%
Energy
7
26%
 
Total votes: 27

User avatar
DoomRater
Posts: 8265
Joined: Wed Jul 28, 2004 8:21 am
Preferred Pronouns: He/Him
Location: WATR HQ
Contact:

Re: Classic weapons vs. high-tech weapons?

Post by DoomRater »

It does kinda depend on the quality of acid though. I mean if it's a compound that sets concrete on fire it should definitely work on undead and potentially robots.
User avatar
Reactor
Posts: 2091
Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2011 6:39 pm
Location: Island's Beauty, Hungary

Re: Classic weapons vs. high-tech weapons?

Post by Reactor »

Acid can work on metal and undead, too, it is true. Toxic gases, biotoxin or radiation will not, though.
User avatar
Zanieon
Posts: 2059
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2009 4:13 pm
Graphics Processor: ATI/AMD with Vulkan/Metal Support
Location: Somewhere in the future
Contact:

Re: Classic weapons vs. high-tech weapons?

Post by Zanieon »

Spoiler: Delivering Nukes to everyone in the way
User avatar
MetroidJunkie
Posts: 709
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2011 7:27 am

Re: Classic weapons vs. high-tech weapons?

Post by MetroidJunkie »

Reactor wrote:Acid can work on metal and undead, too, it is true. Toxic gases, biotoxin or radiation will not, though.

If the gases can be ignited or, better yet, are volatile enough to explode, it could prove effective against all kinds. Or, if it's a type of biological weapon that can eat through flesh and muscle, it would at least prove effective against the undead since it would make them nothing but bones. :wink:
User avatar
Ethril
Posts: 2677
Joined: Sun Nov 16, 2008 2:59 am
Location: with you in the dark

Re: Classic weapons vs. high-tech weapons?

Post by Ethril »

As much as I love the fancy superweapons and such, I tend to prefer conventionally-functioning weapons (even if they use unconventional ammo; a shotgun is a shotgun, whether it fires buckshot or antimatter.)
Post Reply

Return to “Off-Topic”