NSF music support.

Post a reply

Smilies
:D :) :( :o :shock: :? 8-) :lol: :x :P :oops: :cry: :evil: :twisted: :roll: :wink: :geek: :ugeek: :!: :?: :idea: :arrow: :| :mrgreen: :3: :wub: >:( :blergh:
View more smilies

BBCode is OFF
Smilies are ON

Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: NSF music support.

by LK873 » Tue May 10, 2005 1:50 pm

Got that right.

by jallamann » Tue May 10, 2005 1:46 pm

"You hate what you don't understand."

by LK873 » Tue May 10, 2005 1:34 pm

I still hate it.

by jallamann » Tue May 10, 2005 1:30 pm

Celeron has it's place in the world too!

Examples:
  • In a HTPC. Excellent for watching video files and play DVDs. Sufficient performance and low heat emission helps keeping the noise down.

    Office computers. Low price means cheaper computers. There's nothing worse than watching a P4 3.6GHz with 1 GB RAM being used for Word, Excel and Solitaire

by LK873 » Tue May 10, 2005 1:19 pm

NEVER mention Celeron, EVAR!

by jallamann » Tue May 10, 2005 1:00 pm

Word: Intel
Word: Pentium

Sure, I can see the problem. Probably common.

by DoomRater » Tue May 10, 2005 11:51 am

I think he meant Intel? A simple typo I'm sure.

by jallamann » Tue May 10, 2005 11:47 am

MasterOFDeath wrote:I'm still racking my brain on why Pentium even still makes those absolutely shitty Celeron processors.
And I'm still wondering how come pineapples creates lousy bananas

by DoomRater » Tue May 10, 2005 7:59 am

They're for people who don't care about speed and just want a computer that's about $200. At least, that's what I've seen. But really... you could get about the same deal just buying a more powerful computer refurbished.

by MasterOFDeath » Tue May 10, 2005 5:48 am

DoomRater wrote:Or maybe the dreaded CELERON! ZOMG!
I'm still racking my brain on why Pentium even still makes those absolutely shitty Celeron processors. My aunt got a new computer not long ago that actually has one (and yes, its a brand new, pre built machine). Every celeron I have used has been a slow, buggy piece of SHIT.

by wildweasel » Mon May 09, 2005 4:33 pm

It's a Pentium 4, with 512K cache (for what it's worth).

by DoomRater » Mon May 09, 2005 6:59 am

Or maybe the dreaded CELERON! ZOMG!

by MasterOFDeath » Mon May 09, 2005 6:16 am

When I listen to USF music the highest I have seen it go is 19%, and when I run project 64 the most that gets eaten up is about 20%. And I run a AMD Athalon 2800+ 1.4 GHz. You must be running a pentium 4 WildWeasel to have THAT much being chewed away...

by DoomRater » Fri May 06, 2005 8:41 am

I should restate- 20-30% is normal for my USF music. Using 64th note 0.09 and XMPlay 3.2. Funny thing to install it to XMPlay requires renaming XMPlay.exe to Winamp.exe. I'm pretty sure that processor stinks too... XMPlay is in the tray (with a custom "windows" skin) and is using 3,380KB. I get no stutter on Deus Vult playing map05, however trying to play Massmouth 2 on my laptop would kill it if I didn't use -nomusic. And those are MODs in the background.

I just think it's too bad for implementing NSF support, because the problem there is twofold- the track number (which was handled fine for impulse trackers) and the fact that there is no perfect NSF codec. That alone makes it hard to implement it. Of course, some of the stuff is merely bad ripping (the pauses in the Contra theme when you play the NSF and when you play the ROM... try it with FCE Ultra which is also an NSF player, and you'll hear the difference if you listen closely) but until someone gets it perfect... yeah.

by NiGHTMARE » Fri May 06, 2005 7:18 am

jallamann wrote:All 58 songs from GoldenEye eats 609 kB. Beat that with the same quality with OGG and I'm impressed beyond compare.
Personally I prefer a larger file size over more CPU usage.

Top