by yum13241 » Mon Jul 26, 2021 9:36 am
We all know nextmap, right?
The problem is that it makes you lose your stuff, which ik is intentional, bc it calls map.
Why isn't there a changenextmap command, which acts like nextmap, but calls the changemap command, which doesn't make you lose your stuff.
My request is for the changenextmap command to become a reality and not just a little dream of mine.
TL;DR: changenextmap = nextmap, but calls changemap instead of map.
We all know nextmap, right?
The problem is that it makes you lose your stuff, which ik is intentional, bc it calls map.
Why isn't there a changenextmap command, which acts like nextmap, but calls the changemap command, which doesn't make you lose your stuff.
My request is for the changenextmap command to become a reality and not just a little dream of mine.
TL;DR: changenextmap = nextmap, but calls changemap instead of map.