ZDoom

Oh, I see. I never looked at it closely enough.

Look at my code. One is the activator, the other the specified tid.

[quote="cutmanmike"]Since you can do this in ACS anyway (with a bit more hassle) why not have this? A little low priority but there you go[/quote]
What would it do? And don't you need two things to be able to tell the distance between them?

function int abs(int x)
{
  if (x>=0) return x;
  return -x;
}

function int min(int x, int y)
{
    if (x<y) return x;
    else return y;
}

function int AproxDistance(int dx, int dy)
{
	int dx = abs(dx);
	int dy = abs(dy);
	return dx+dy-(min(dx,dy)>>1);
}

function void GetDistance(int tid)
{
    int x=abs(GetActorX(tid)-GetActorX(activatortid()));
    int y=abs(GetActorY(tid)-GetActorY(activatortid()));
    int z=abs(GetActorZ(tid)-GetActorZ(activatortid()));

    return AproxDistance(AproxDistance(x,y), z);
}

[code]

function int abs(int x)
{
if (x>=0) return x;
return -x;
}

function int min(int x, int y)
{
if (x<y) return x;
else return y;
}

function int AproxDistance(int dx, int dy)
{
int dx = abs(dx);
int dy = abs(dy);
return dx+dy-(min(dx,dy)>>1);
}

function void GetDistance(int tid)
{
int x=abs(GetActorX(tid)-GetActorX(activatortid()));
int y=abs(GetActorY(tid)-GetActorY(activatortid()));
int z=abs(GetActorZ(tid)-GetActorZ(activatortid()));

return AproxDistance(AproxDistance(x,y), z);
}

[/code]

It used the same precision Doom is using internally for distance calculations as a fixed point value.

Since you can do this in ACS anyway (with a bit more hassle) why not have this? A little low priority but there you go