I just warped to coordinates 0, 0 and changed level by typing MAP ExMy and it crashed.
Here is the CrashReport:
CrashReport.zip- (18.26 KiB) Downloaded 35 times
Crash : Unknown access violation
Moderator: GZDoom Developers
Forum rules
Please don't bump threads here if you have a problem - it will often be forgotten about if you do. Instead, make a new thread here.
Please don't bump threads here if you have a problem - it will often be forgotten about if you do. Instead, make a new thread here.
Crash : Unknown access violation
Hi!
I just warped to coordinates 0, 0 and changed level by typing MAP ExMy and it crashed.
Here is the CrashReport:
I just warped to coordinates 0, 0 and changed level by typing MAP ExMy and it crashed.
Here is the CrashReport:
-
Edward-san
- Posts: 1774
- Joined: Sat Oct 17, 2009 9:40 am
Re: Crash : Unknown access violation
Sadly that build contained a bug which might explain the crash. Just wait for the next build to appear.
Re: Crash : Unknown access violation
Don't modify the ancient network buffer without sufficient testing, folks. 
-
Graf Zahl
- Lead GZDoom+Raze Developer
- Posts: 49252
- Joined: Sat Jul 19, 2003 10:19 am
- Location: Germany
Re: Crash : Unknown access violation
Or rather, don't modify stuff without THINKING about it.
This was one change that got buried in a submission of many pointless alterations, and I would have rejected it outright if it hadn't been for a few genuine issues.
Well, Randi undid most of ZzZombo's stuff anyway. I might have done it, too, but most were just different ways to do the same thing.
But the lesson should be clear: This ends here and now. Any pull request that contains a large number of small and mostly unrelated changes will be rejected from now on, the risk that something is overlooked when reviewing them is just too big.
This was one change that got buried in a submission of many pointless alterations, and I would have rejected it outright if it hadn't been for a few genuine issues.
Well, Randi undid most of ZzZombo's stuff anyway. I might have done it, too, but most were just different ways to do the same thing.
But the lesson should be clear: This ends here and now. Any pull request that contains a large number of small and mostly unrelated changes will be rejected from now on, the risk that something is overlooked when reviewing them is just too big.