I think you and I pretty much agree on why post processing stuff is cool to have in the toolbox.Nash wrote:This is what I have been trying to say the whole time, basically. Copy-pasted from another conversation...

UDMF sounds like the way to go. Wondering whether it is better to extend the existing 'light' property, or add a new one next to it. It might not even need extending as I don't know what really happens if you decide to type 'light = 1000;' for a sector. Will have to test that some day.InsanityBringer wrote:I can't speak for what would need to be done internally , but from a mapping perspective UDMF would make it incredibly easy to change the field size or type without much issue, which is cool
