ZDoom

by **Enjay** » Mon Oct 02, 2006 2:39 pm

Theshooter7 wrote:Yay! now only 0.0.4 more versions until Custom States!

Yay for 2.1.6a, 2.1.6b, 2.1.6c... 2.1.9zzzz

by **Jimmy** » Mon Oct 02, 2006 2:45 pm

Enjay wrote:
Theshooter7 wrote:Yay! now only 0.0.4 more versions until Custom States!

Yay for 2.1.6a, 2.1.6b, 2.1.6c... 2.1.9zzzz

...is that you falling asleep or are you teasing us?

by **Graf Zahl** » Mon Oct 02, 2006 2:51 pm

Hmm, who is saying that 2.1.10 is not a valid version number?

by **Ryan Cordell** » Mon Oct 02, 2006 3:12 pm

Graf Zahl wrote:Hmm, who is saying that 2.1.10 is not a valid version number?

You're a weenie Graf, a real weenie.

(Heh, no offense. XP)

by **HotWax** » Mon Oct 02, 2006 3:15 pm

Yeah, I think people forgot all about 2.0.64.....

by **Enjay** » Mon Oct 02, 2006 3:32 pm

Ahhh, the much anticipated 64.

by **Wills** » Mon Oct 02, 2006 3:35 pm

Good thing I checked this place before recording the demos for UII. /me downloads

by **Nash** » Mon Oct 02, 2006 4:48 pm

It appears that 2.2.0 isn't as close as we think it'll be.

by **Eriance** » Mon Oct 02, 2006 5:23 pm

Now to wait for the GZdoom equivilent. Hopefully A_Implode or something similar will be added in soon.

by **Nash** » Mon Oct 02, 2006 5:26 pm

I'm rather concerned with the new bugs in 2.1.6, especially ENTER scripts, which my project heavily uses and I'd rather wait a little longer for the next version of GZDoom.

The last time ENTER scripts were broken, it took a very long time before a fixed version came out. :/

by **Eriance** » Mon Oct 02, 2006 5:45 pm

Nash wrote:I'm rather concerned with the new bugs in 2.1.6, especially ENTER scripts, which my project heavily uses and I'd rather wait a little longer for the next version of GZDoom.

The last time ENTER scripts were broken, it took a very long time before a fixed version came out. :/

Well i can wait a long time. I wont be doing much Doom editing anytime soon anyway. College has been eating my soul alive.

by **Nash** » Mon Oct 02, 2006 5:51 pm

In that case, I think you'll have to either put your project on hold or scrap some ideas; it certainly doesn't look like any new code pointers are going to be added soon.

The Feature Requests forum is piling up. Even some of the small requests aren't being considered, let alone a new code pointer...

by **Eriance** » Mon Oct 02, 2006 5:54 pm

Nash wrote:In that case, I think you'll have to either put your project on hold or scrap some ideas; it certainly doesn't look like any new code pointers are going to be added soon.

The Feature Requests forum is piling up. Even some of the small requests aren't being considered, let alone a new code pointer...

Well, Graf said he'as already done it before, and the only reason he didn't release it is because the crappy Doom physics didn't allow the monster to NOT go through the calling actor of A_Implode. I think no one really cares about that, though.

by **skadoomer** » Mon Oct 02, 2006 9:36 pm

randy wrote:PlayerPawn and PlayerChunk have more flags defaulted to on.

What flags are these? Are they all the ones defined in the doomplayer actor?

by **Carnevil** » Mon Oct 02, 2006 11:11 pm

randy is off my Christmas list

ZDoom

ZDoom 2.1.6

Re: ZDoom 2.1.6

Who is online